When a series of books is particularly popular, there’s often a push to keep the series going once its original author has retired from writing or has passed away. When that happens, another author sometimes takes up the proverbial mantle and continues the series. Some people argue that this makes sense; it means that readers can continue to enjoy a beloved series or character. More pragmatically, it also means that the series can continue to sell. Many people, though, don’t like the idea of having another author continue a series. After all, it’s the original author who created the series, and when that particular author is out of the picture, the series is never quite the same.
Historian Larry Millett has used his knowledge of the history of the Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota area and his fascination with Arthur Conan Doyle’s Sherlock Holmes to write a series of Sherlock Holmes novels. Millett’s own creation, Minnesota bartender and P.I. Shadwell Rafferty, works with Holmes and Watson in Sherlock Holmes and the Secret Alliance, Sherlock Holmes and the Ice Palace Murders, and other novels. The setting of these stories is the Minneapolis/St. Paul area rather than London, so Conan Doyle purists may be disappointed. On the other hand, many readers enjoy the Shadwell Rafferty character on his own merits, and the mysteries themselves are carefully constructed and believable.
Agatha Christie is said to have disliked the idea of someone else creating new stories for her sleuths, so she herself wrote the last stories involving Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple and stored them safely during World War II so that if she didn’t survive the war, her series would end as she wanted them to end. There have, though, been some adaptations of her work. With the permission of Christie’s heirs, Charles Osborne has adapted some of her plays (Black Coffee, Spider’s Web,and The Unexpected Guest) as novels. This decision has introduced millions of new readers to those stories and to Christie’s work and, I’m sure, motivated many readers to look up and read the original plays and perhaps see them when they are produced. On the other hand, the adaptations are not Christie’s own work. There are differences between the way Christie adapted her own writing (e.g. the play The Witness for the Prosecution was adapted from a short story she’d written) and the way Osborne has adapted her work. That makes sense, of course, since they are different writers.
Dorothy Sayers’ last Lord Peter Wimsey novel was 1937’s Busman’s Honeymoon, in which newlyweds Harriet Vane and Lord Peter Wimsey visit Tallboys, a country home that Wimsey’s bought for his bride. Instead of a peaceful honeymoon, though, the two get caught up in a murder investigation when the body of the property’s former owner is found in the basement. After Sayers’ death, an unfinished manuscript was found among her papers. Plans for completing the manuscript Thrones, Dominations were finally put into action when English novelist Jill Paton Walsh was approached in 1996 by the literary trustees of Sayers’ estate. Walsh was commissioned to complete Thrones, Dominations and subsequently went on to write two more Wimsey/Vane novels. Sayers had left behind a set of notes that Walsh has used as the basis for those novels, so on one hand, those novels are quite true to the original characters. On the other, a purist would argue that they are not Sayers’ own work.
With the permission of Rex Stout’s estate, journalist Robert Goldsborough wrote a series of seven Nero Wolfe novels between 1986 and 1994. Goldsborough made some changes to the original Nero Wolfe/Archie Goodwin context, mostly to keep up with the times. For example, in some of Goldsborough’s novels, Goodwin uses a personal computer for record-keeping. The famous elevator that carries Nero Wolfe among the floors of his brownstone has been updated in the Goldsborough novels, too. On one hand, these updates can make a series appealing to a whole new group of readers. On the other, there are differences between Rex Stout’s writing and Robert Goldsborough’s writing. Those who are true fans of Stout’s particular approach to the series may be disappointed in Goldsborough’s novels.
Sometimes, the proverbial mantle is passed to member of the author’s family. That’s what happened in the case of Dick Francis, who wrote more than 42 mystery novels, including the famous Sid Halley series. What a lot of people didn’t know was that he worked closely with his wife Mary Benchley as he wrote. Five years after her death, Francis’ son Felix, who’d been managing his father’s financial affairs, was approached about having a new co-author work on some fresh novels. Felix Francis decided that instead of choosing a new author, he’d like to do the job himself. So Dick and Felix Francis worked together on several of Francis’ last novels. Sadly, Dick Francis passed away in 2010, and it will be very interesting to see whether Felix Francis decides to carry on his father’s mystery/thriller tradition.
Lilian Jackson Braun was in the process of writing The Cat Who Smelled Smoke, her 30th Cat Who… novel when she passed away. As of the date this post is published, I don’t know whether anyone will be commissioned to finish the novel and if so, who will do the writing. But I’ll be very curious to see whether it happens. But what do you think? Do you think a series should end with the retirement or passing of its creator? Or do you think the proverbial mantle can be passed along? If you’re a writer, how do you feel about your characters living on in others’ writing?













How would I feel about someone else taking over my characters upon my demise? That’s easy: Show me, er my estate, the money!!!
Alan – LOL! Now, that’s a good point. If someone else is going to use the characters we create, s/he needs to make it worth our heirs’ while…
I like the idea of characters continuing after the author’s death. I prefer the new books that either create a character patterned after the originial character or add new characters to the storyline. The Goldsborough books about Nero Wolfe were alright but no better. Graham Mooer’s book, The Sherlockian, was an example of creating a Holmes based character. The early Laurie R. King’s series on Holmes and Mary Russell were wonderful examples of adding a character. Still there are great examples of new stories featuring original characters. Donald Thomas’ stories with Holmes are superb. I think it may work better for stories to have authors decide to take up the challenge of continuing rather than estates approving authors. Let the estates collect their share of the royalties but let authors decide if they want to continue a character.
Bill – Thanks for your suggestions of great continuations of the Holmes stories. You’re quite right about the King and Thomas stories, in my opinion. And you raise a very interesting point whether authors should take up that challenge themselves or be chosen by estates. Some might argue that having estates approve authors means that author will keep closely to the original character. On the other hand, as you say, it can be intriguing and add new dimensions to a character if an author makes that choice him or herself. I would say that if an author is going to do that, she or he needs to “do some homework” and be thoroughly familiar with the original character.
I tend not to read the series novels written after an author’s death using the same characters. They’re just not the same. And I wouldn’t want anyone else to pick up my Sylvia and Willie characters and write new stories either. Guess I better put that in my will.
Pat – I guess you’d better
. I know what you mean, too; I’m kinda partial to my own Joel Williams, and I sometimes have the feeling I’d come back from Beyond and nag anyone else who tried to write him into something to make sure they did it right
. I think writers really do feel a real connection like that with their characters. You’re by no means alone, either, in preferring the characters you read about to stay the way the original author wrote them. Lots of people feel precisely the same way.
I hate the thought of someone else picking up the mantle, it smacks of obsession to me, or money grubbing, there’s something inherently tasteless about it.
I read Charles Osbourne’s adaptation of Black Coffee and didn’t like it. He made Hercule Poirot seem like an arrogant prat and completely lacking in charm. It wasn’t very enjoyable.
Vanda – You’re not the only one who didn’t much like that adaptation of Black Coffee. A lot of people feel that it didn’t do justice to Poirot and for the matter of that, to Hastings, either. I’ve found that people usually either really like this adaptation or, like you, really do not.
And you make an interesting point about the “down side” of picking up the mantle. Sometimes it is done for money reasons or obsession and when that happens, it spoils the magic the original author wove. Even when it’s not done for those reasons, lots of people think it cheapens the original work. It’s most definitely a tricky thing to do at all. It’s even trickier to do it well.
If the series and the characters are not changed drastically, I like the idea of a series continuing. Minor changes to keep the story up-to-date wouldn’t be bad. I love Lillian Jackson Braun’s series and hope someone continues it in her wonderful tradition. I can think of one other series that I would like to see continued. Anne George wrote a cozy mystery series about two sisters – Sister and Mouse – and they were such fun reads. Anne died in 2001. One of her books was called Murder Boogies With Elvis.
Mason
Thoughts in Progress
Freelance Editing By Mason
Mason – You know, I know about Anne George’s work, but I’ve never tried the series. It’s a shame that she passed on before I could. I’m going to have to look for that series and see what I think. It’s sad when a beloved author passes or stops writing a series, isn’t it? I’ll be really interested to see whether anyone finishes The Cat Who Smelled Smoke….
I’m with Alan! And preferably, show me the money before my unfortunate demise, so that I can be the one to enjoy it…
Elizabeth – …and why not? You’re the one who worked hard to create those characters!
As a reader, I have never read a book picking up on a series, but by someone else, that has been any good. I have read a few, eg continuations of Gone with the Wind, Pride and Prejudice, etc, and found them like cardboard. I have not read Jill Paton Walsh’s DLS continuations but funnily enough I met someone a couple of days ago who mentioned that she’d just read one (The Attenbury Diamonds) and not only was the plot weak but the author did not “get” the class nuances of the day that were intrinsic to the actual books.
Basically, “follow ons” are fakes in my view and I have no interest in reading, eg, someone else’s take on James Bond (I did actually read one, by “Robert Conquest” years ago and did not like it).
Virginia Andrews is another one. And of course, L. Ron Hubbard, “the most prolific corpse in history” as he was once dubbed.
An interesting corollory of what you write here, Margot, is “factory writing”, in which other people write under a “brand” author’s name. Isaac Asmiov farmed out the books written in his name, eventually, for example (I know someone who has written some!). I have heard people say that Mary Higgins Clark does not actually write her books any more, but I like them. I wonder how often I am “duped” in this way without realising it?
Maxine – How interesting that you would mention the follow-up to Gone With the Wind. I got just a few chapters into it and did not finish it. I usually try to stick with a book, but in that case, I couldn’t do it. It wasn’t anything like the original Margaret Mitchell, and I think that’s the case with many series that are continued by someone other than the original author. It’s possible to create a new story with an established sleuth but rarely is it done well, and I can completely see why you avoid such things.
I have to confess that I haven’t read Jill Paton Walsh’s Lord Peter Wimsey novels, so I can’t comment on whether they are good, but I agree 100% with you that the social class nuances of the day play critical roles in the Wimsey stories and if they’re not there, I would guess the story wouldn’t work. The same goes, in my opinion, with some of the gender, racial and other social nuances of that time.
And thank you for bringing up the whole issues of authors with “big” names whose work is written by others. I like that name, too – “factory writing.” It’s quite appropriate. I’m not sure whether MHC has done that, but I’d heard that about some of Asimov’s stuff (although Mr. Confessions of a Mystery Novelist…, who’s a big Asimov fan, would not like to accept that as fact). Good to know that not everything I hear is just gossip
. To me, a big part of this is basically integrity. The author’s integrity, the integrity of what is written, the publisher’s integrity and so on, are all at stake. It’s a sobering issue, and thought-provoking. I’ll probably do a post on it at some point when I’ve had the chance to think about it a bit…
I am sure Isaac Asimov did write his earlier, and great, novels and short stories, you can reassure Mr COMN. But if he reads, for example, the original foundation trilogy and then tries the prequel or the follow-ups, I think he’ll see the point
Thanks, Maxine – Actually, I will ask Mr. COAMN about that. It’ll be interesting to see what he says about it…
If you don’t want anyone to continue your series, you should mention that in your will. Even if you want others to continue with it or you don’t write a series, you should still have a writer’s will.
Here’s a really excellent blog on the subject by Neil Gaiman which includes a PDF form that writers can use to explain their wishes on their works.
http://journal.neilgaiman.com/2006/10/important-and-pass-it-on.html
If you already have a will, I’d use this form as an addenda to your will since it revokes previous wills. And, as he said, talk to your lawyer.
Thanks for pointing that out Marilynn – Some writery friends and I have had discussions about our literary estates, so that’s really useful!
Might have to read Neil Gaiman’s blog more often.
Marilyn,
Wow! Thank you for that really useful information! You’re quite right that it’s probably a very good idea to prepare for the inevitable that way, and deciding what happens to one’s literary estate is important. I’m so glad you brought that topic up, and shared that link.
I’ve been a huge fan of the Dick Francis books since I found the first one in my dentist’s waiting room. Regardless of who wrote them, the stories are pure pleasure to read, with phrases that feel as if they couldn’t have been set on paper any other way.
Certainly, since Mary died, the writing has changed somewhat. I believe, though, that Felix Francis has talent, and if the later books don’t please me quite as much, it’s no doubt because I’m so familiar with the old friends.
Maybe that’s always the case. Maybe it’s not wise to become so fond of a writer’s style that one can’t accept some alteration. But we can’t help it, can we?
Anita – I really think you have a well-taken point. We do get very accustomed to the way an author writes. So that if someone else picks up a series, we know it’s going to be at least a bit different. That doesn’t have to be bad or good, but it is different. And that in itself is sometimes enough to disappoint us even if the other author has talent. And I have to agree with you; Dick Francis had so much talent!