Y, here we are, almost at the end of the alphabet! The Alphabet in Crime Fiction community meme has reached our 25th stop on our criminal journey – the letter “Y.” Thanks, as ever, to our leader Kerrie at Mysteries in Paradise for expert guidance. My contribution to this week’s stop is Margaret Yorke’s Speak For the Dead, published in 1988.
As the novel begins, Gordon Matthews has recently got out of prison after being convicted of manslaughter in the death of his wife Anne. Anne’s father Oliver Randall is afraid that now that Matthews is out of prison, he’ll try to take their two children, who’ve been living with Randall and his wife. So Randall hires private investigator Michael West to locate Matthews and see what he’s doing and how he’s living. West agrees and begins to look into the case. As he starts to ask questions, he finds out something disturbing: Anne Randall wasn’t at all the kind of person that her husband made her out to be. At the trial, Matthews claimed his wife was a promiscuous, alcoholic shrew who made his life miserable. His claim was that they’d had an argument that got out of control when she pushed him too far, and that’s why he killed her. The jury believed him and he was given a light sentence. West, however, discovers that Anne Randall was a quiet, loving woman who rarely drank and was, to the best of anyone’s knowledge, faithful to her husband. It now seems that there’s much more to this death than it seems on the surface. So West prepares to dig deeper.
Since his release from prison, Gordon Matthews has remarried. He met his new wife Carrie Foster in a London café, but what he doesn’t know is that she’s been working as a prostitute. When they marry, Carrie gives up the life and looks forward to settling down. Gordon admits he was married before but claims that his wife left him; he doesn’t tell Carrie what really happened. For a time, Carrie and Gordon are happy enough, but within a few years, she realises that Gordon Matthews is not the man she thought she’d married. She’s bored with her life and what’s worse, Matthews has shown himself to be petulant, demanding, a liar and a heavy drinker. He doesn’t seem able to keep a job, and blames everyone else for his problems.
Bored and restless, and with her husband often unemployed, Carrie returns to her former line of work. Once a week she goes to London to meet her clients, telling her husband she’s doing volunteer work. Although Gordon and Carrie are deceiving each other, all goes tolerably well until Carrie meets Nicholas Fitzmaurice, a young man who’s taking classes in London. Carrie doesn’t tell Nicholas that she’s married, and it’s not long before he falls very much in love with her. With her marriage to Gordon falling apart, Carrie’s attracted to Nicholas, too – mostly to his innocence and good nature.
While all of this intrigue is going on, Michael West is closing in on Gordon Matthews. When he finds out Matthews has married again, he’s all the more determined to do so in order to spare this new wife Anne Randall Matthews’ fate. All of the plot threads come together in one tragic incident, and we see the consequences of deception (including self-deception).
In fact, deception is a key theme in this novel. Gordon Matthews deceives himself about what happened to his first wife. He’s blamed everyone else, including Anne, for his problems for so long that he’s come to believe the lies he told the jury. To him, everything would have been fine if Anne had been a better wife. When we meet Matthews’ parents Hannah and Donald, we see where this self-delusion comes from. Hannah Matthews has delusions about what her family “should be.” She’s pushed her husband up the proverbial corporate ladder and she’s pushed her children into paths they never wanted. The Matthews family is highly dysfunctional, but Hannah deludes herself into blaming everyone else. For instance, she blamed Anne Randall for “ruining” her son Gordon, instead of seeing that situation for what it was. Nicholas Fitzmaurice deceives himself about the kind of person Carrie is, too. He wants to believe she’s a nice young woman, and for a long time, doesn’t want to know the truth about her. There’s a lot of deception of others in this story, too. Carrie and Gordon Matthews deceive each other and their families. Carrie deceives Nicholas as well, and as the novel plays out, we see how this deception acts like a “house of cards.” When the façade crumbles, the result is devastating. In a few cases, the self-deception continues, and that result isn’t much better.
Another element woven through this novel is the set of characters. Carrie Foster isn’t exactly a “nice girl,” but she’s friendly, loving, appealing and we learn to care about her. She’s vivacious and energetic, and it’s easy to admire her independence. Nicholas Fitzmaurice is a conscientious young man with a warm heart and a strong sense of ethics. We care about him and his grandmother, with whom he lives, quite a lot. It’s also easy to care about the characters of Anne Randall’s parents, who’ve been through so much, and we can empathise with Oliver Randall’s determination to keep his grandchildren safe and to clear his dead daughter’s character. Even the characters we don’t get to know as well are interesting and a good “fit” for this story. One of the ways in which Yorke makes these characters come alive is by telling the story from a variety of perspectives. For instance, we see Carrie Foster through her own eyes, through her husband’s eyes, through Nicholas Fitzmaurice’s eyes, and through the eyes of her friend Arlene. Each of their points of view is slightly different, and it gives readers a clear picture of that character. Some readers find the use of multiple perspectives distracting, but Yorke makes it clear whose perspective is being shared, so it honestly didn’t pull me out of the story.
It’s in part because of the characters that readers also get a real sense of suspense, and that, too, is woven throughout the story. We want to warn Carrie not to marry a man like Gordon Matthews. We want to shout out to Nicholas Fitzmaurice to be careful getting involved with Carrie. We even feel the sense of suspense as Gordon Matthew gets into a desperate situation himself, even though he’s not a sympathetic character. The timing and pacing of the novel also contribute to the suspense. Bit by bit, Michael West and the journalist he works with uncover the truth about Gordon Matthews. Bit by bit, as Carrie and Gordon’s relationship falls apart, and as Carrie gets more and more involved with Nicholas, we sense the danger to her. That slow buildup of tension is a very effective “fit” for this novel of psychological suspense.
There are a number of characters in this novel, and keeping track of them takes some effort. But they’re all there for a reason, and Yorke ties all of the plot threads and characters together. A psychological mystery that focuses as much on characters as on a murder, Speak For the Dead shows the many consequences of living a lie. But what do you think? Have you read Speak For the Dead? If you have, what elements do you see in it?












Sounds really well done – thanks Margot, great choice, especially as I have not read a single thing by Yorke (I’m embarrassed to say) but am definitely going to get one now – as you say, so many books, so little time, but one has to try none the less …
Sergio – Thanks much for stopping back
. Yes, I thought this a well-done novel. More characterisation than fast action but, in my opinion, solid suspense and a good story. And some interesting twists, too. And you’re quite right – there are just too many books and too little time to get through all of them. My TBR list is embarrassingly long…
I haven’t read this book, but it certainly sounds a good read. I particularly like Margaret Yorke’s style of writing that makes me care about the characters even if they’re not very likeable, seeing them from different perspectives does make them come over as real people – very clever, I think.
Margaret – I think that’s what I like about York’s writing, too. Even the people in this novel who aren’t particularly nice people come across as people you can care about. And I thought she used multiple perspectives quite effectively here to tell the story. I really think you’d like this one.
Add me to the ‘not read this one yet, but will’ list!.
Sarah – I think you’ll like this one. Well, I did, at any rate
.
I have not yet read her books. But I did just finish a book about a woman who did speak for the dead in 12th-century England, Adelia Aguilar. I cannot believe I held off reading this. I don’t usually like historical mysteries — but what do I know? Well what I didn’t know was how book was the series first book, how much I’d like the character, her ideas, her opposition to anti-Semitism and anti=Moslemism, her scientific, logical approach to everything, her scoffing at superstitution, her self-confidence and standing up for herself as a woman, and I liked her ideas, including on the death penalty and how she stood up to the church or whomever. And yet she was compassionate, witty and enjoyed fun. Too bad there are only three more, but I’ll parcel them out like Sjowall and Wahloo.
Kathy – Oh, yes, you’d mentioned really enjoying the Ariana Franklin novels about Adelia Aguilar. I like the main character in that series very much, too, and you’re quite right; she’s a strong character with strong opinions and feelings and that makes her all the more appealing, doesn’t it? Those novels also evoke a real sense of place and time, and I like that. And of course, I like historical mysteries, so the series appeals to me on that level, too. It is a shame that Franklin died and the series ended; they were well-written books.
Wow, talk about suspense. The characters place themselves in so much trouble. I haven’t read the book but you have me hooked.
Clarissa – Oh, you put that quite well – the characters really do get themselves in an awful lot of trouble. There are a few places where I just wanted to yell out a warning (not that they’d have listened…). It’s not the kind of suspense that you get in an “action” novel, but it’s no less effective.
Thanks for remembering her. I’d like to include this on Friday if I can. I don’t think she’s been mentioned more than once.
Patti – Oh, I’d be honoured – thank you
. You know, I think Margaret Yorke is one of those sometimes-under-rated authors that should get more notice than she does…
I’ve read some of Margaret Yorke’s books…but I don’t think I’ve read this one. I *love* deceptions and lies in mysteries! And I enjoy psychological mysteries, too…so I’ll put this one on my list.
Thanks!
Elizabeth – Yorke’s not really as well-known as I personally think she might be, so I’m glad you’ve read some of her writing. This novel really explores what happens when people live lies, so I think you’ll enjoy it. And it’s not heavy on the gore, either, which I have to admit appeals to me.
Like Sara Wood, Margaret Yorke has fallen into limbo of forgotten crime fiction, for sure. And suffers the fate of being a citizen of the ignominous land I call Out-of-Printdom. (What is it about the authors at the end of the alphabet?) I find her books all the time at sales all over the US and i pass ovder them so I’m jsut as guilty as prublishers who refuse to bring her work back into the light of day. This in depth review, however, may get me to finally read one of her books.
J.F – Very apt comparison to Sara Wood in terms of books having fallen out of print. It’s a shame, too (well, at least in my opinion), as authors’ work is good quality. Many it is a sort of end-of-the-alphabet syndrome….