Take it to the Limit One More Time*

Most people would agree that it can add interest to a crime fiction story or series if the sleuth or another major character has to deal with difficult or even traumatic situations. Those situations can raise the tension, give the sleuth more depths and add interesting layers to the story, too. And if the sleuth survives the situation and comes out stronger (or at least more evolved as a character) that can make her or him more interesting. But of course, there are limits, too. If the sleuth is put through too much and pushed too far, this can end up being gratuitous. And readers don’t like it if their favourite characters are pushed beyond their limits. So an author has to achieve a very tricky balance between adding some believable risk, loss, sadness and tragedy to a sleuth’s life (otherwise, the plot and the sleuth become flat) and putting the sleuth through unendurable and gratuitous horror (at which point readers rightfully rebel). The problem is that this line is subjective, and we all have different definitions of “gratuitous.” That said, though, it is also a very interesting balance and if it’s done well, achieving that balance can add much to a story or series.

For instance, in Agatha Christie’s Sad Cypress, Hercule Poirot investigates the poisoning murder of Mary Gerrard, daughter of the lodgekeeper at Hunterbury. Hunterbury is owned by wealthy Laura Welman, who’s taken quite a liking to Mary. In fact, Laura Welman’s niece Elinor Carlisle gets an anonymous letter one day saying that she and her fiancé Roderick “Roddy” Welman may be done out of their rightful inheritance if they aren’t careful. Although neither is greedy, both are accustomed to money and not interested in living without it. So, since Aunt Laura’s been ill lately anyway, they travel to Hunterbury. While they’re there, Roddy Welman sees Mary Gerrard for the first time in years and immediately becomes enamoured of her. This is a severe blow to Elinor, who’s very much in love with Roddy, more with him than he is with her.  Nonetheless, Roddy and Elinor manage to stay together and they leave Hunterbury once they see that all is well enough with Aunt Laura. Then, they get news that Aunt Laura has worsened and return to Hunterbury just before she dies. To Elinor’s grief, Roddy is even more smitten with Mary Gerrard.  Then one afternoon, Mary Gerrard is poisoned. The most likely suspect is Elinor, since she was jealous over Roddy’s feelings for the victim. There is also a financial motive, since there was every possibility that Aunt Laura would have changed her will in favour of Mary if she could have done so. And there’s physical evidence that links Elinor directly to Mary’s murder. So Elinor is arrested and tried, which adds more to her trauma. It doesn’t help matters that she’s Aunt Laura’s executrix and has to take on the responsibility of managing this large fortune. Local doctor Peter Lord has fallen in love with Elinor and sees how much she’s going through. So he asks Hercule Poirot to do whatever is necessary to clear Elinor’s name. Poirot agrees and investigates the case. He finds that Elinor Carlisle is by no means the only person with a motive for murder. In this case, the deaths of Laura Welman and Mary Gerrard have to do with a past secret. As the novel goes on, we can see how much Elinor Carlisle is going through and we feel sympathy for her even though she may be a murderer. In fact, her ordeal is so difficult that at the end of the novel, she is taken to a sanatorium to regain her mental health.

Michael Connelly’s Harry Bosch has gone through a lot, too. For one thing, he’s survived a very unpleasant childhood and lived through the murder of his mother. He’s also seen the horrors of the Vietnam War. Bosch gets put through a lot on the job, too. In The Concrete Blonde, for instance, he’s faced with a wrongful death lawsuit. He’d been tracking a serial killer known as The Dollmaker and strongly suspected that Norman Church was the man he wanted. Bosch ended up shooting Church and now, Church’s family is suing Bosch. As if that weren’t enough, during the trial, another body is discovered and this murder bears all the hallmarks of a “Dollmaker” killing. So Bosch has to deal not only with his own conduct in killing Norman Church, but also with the possibility that he may have killed the wrong man and that the real Dollmaker is still out there. And then in 9 Dragons, Bosch has to cope with every parent’s nightmare: he gets a frantic call from Hong Kong, where his daughter Maddie lives with her mother. Maddie’s been kidnapped and it looks as though her abduction might be related to a case Bosch is working. So he takes the first flight he can to Hong Kong and begins to search desperately for her, in the meantime trying to avoid getting killed himself. Bosch gets through this harrowing experience and all that comes with it, and although we get the feeling he’ll be back on his feet again, we also see the toll that it takes on him.

Vanda Symon’s DC Sam Shepherd has also been pushed to her limit in a few ways. In Overkill, she’s suspected of murder when Gabriella Knowes, the wife of Shepherd’s former lover, is found dead on the banks of the Maturana River. At first the death looks like a suicide, but when it comes out that the supposed suicide note she wrote was forged, it’s clear that she was murdered. Sam then has to deal with frustration, marginalisation and suspension. She is also the prime suspect and has a personal stake in the case. In Containment, Shepherd tries to help restore order when a ship runs aground near Dunedin and spills containers everywhere. Looting and fighting over the containers begins, and Shepherd tries to stop the chaos. She’s attacked by one of the looters, she has ongoing problems with her boss, and to make matters worse, things in her personal life aren’t very settled either. She’s having family problems and what’s more, her boyfriend tells her that he’s applied for a job that will move him to Dunedin – not something Shepherd is sure she wants. We get the strong feeling that Sam Shepherd is able to get through the things that happen to her, but that doesn’t make it any easier for her.

The same is true of James Lee Burke’s Dave Robicheaux. He carries several scars from his past, including the trauma associated with his service in Vietnam. In Black Cherry Blues, we learn that he still has nightmares about the murder of his wife Annie, which he couldn’t prevent even though he was present. And throughout the novels featuring him, he faces a continuing battle to stay sober. In A Morning for Flamingos, he’s shot and left for dead (neither the first nor the last time he’s injured), and he’s had more than one experience with being set up and betrayed. Robicheaux is a strong and complex character who’s sustained by that strength and by his love for his adopted daughter Alafair. Again, we have the sense that he will survive, but he is pushed to his limits.

So is Åsa Larsson’s Rebecka Martinsson, a Stockholm tax attorney who’s originally from the far north town of Kiruna. In Sun Storm (AKA The Savage Altar), she returns to Kiruna when a former friend is arrested for the brutal murder of her brother and begs Martinsson to help clear her name. In the course of that investigation, Martinsson has a very traumatic experience which leaves her quite fragile. That doesn’t help in the next novel, The Blood Spilt, in which she gets involved in the investigation of the death of Mildred Nilsson, a priest whose body is found hung from a tree near the church she served. At the end of that novel, Martinsson has two terrible experiences that are so traumatic that she ends up being sent to a psychiatric facility so that she can begin to heal. She’s a very strong person although she is also vulnerable, so we get the feeling that she will survive. But she is pushed to the limits of her endurance.

And then there’s Nevada Barr’s Anna Pigeon. When the series featuring her begins, she’s recovering from the death of her husband and as a part of that healing, leaves New York City, where she’s been living. She becomes a park ranger for the National Park Service, where her job allows her to indulge her passion for the outdoors and for nature and its creatures. But life does not get any easier for Pigeon for that. She battles alcoholism and loneliness and her adventures frequently get her badly physically injured as well. There’s also plenty of psychological trauma in Pigeon’s life, as many of her cases cost her dearly. For instance, in Borderline, she faces the case of a young pregnant woman who’s running from a murderer, and in Burn, she has to cope with the reality of real brutality to children. Pigeon is a very sturdy character in her own way, so the reader knows she’ll probably heal. But her cases do take an incredible toll on her.

The question of how much to put major characters through is not an easy one. Too much trauma puts readers off. Too little difficulty and there’s a risk of a “flat” novel or series. What’s more, people have different definitions of what counts as “too much,” so striking that balance isn’t easy. But what do you think? Which authors do you think have struck a solid balance? What do you think counts as “too much?” If you’re a writer, is there a limit to what you’ll put your characters through? Do you find it hard to have things happen to them?

 

 

 

*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from the Eagles’ Take it to the Limit.

About these ads

22 Comments

Filed under Agatha Christie, Åsa Larsson, James Lee Burke, Michael Connelly, Nevada Barr, Vanda Symon

22 Responses to Take it to the Limit One More Time*

  1. It seems to be a popular trend these years not only to put your detective at risk, but to let psychopaths be after him or her in every single volume of a series. One story of that kind is okay, but I am very much against this unrealistic trick of involving the detective personally every time. An example is Patricia Cornwell´s series about Scarpetta which began well but turned absolutely ridiculous (if you ask me).

    • Dorte – I’ve noticed too that a lot of plots now involve the sleuth in real danger, whether from a psychopath or somebody else. Sometimes it works well enough, but the device is used so often now that I think it really has become a bit cliché. It’s honestly gotten to the point where when I know that will be part of the plot, I tend to put a book right back on the shelf unless someone I trust has read it and liked it.

  2. I agree with you and Dorte. It’s a fine balance. I watch many mystery programs on television and they always have to relate a really bad incident to the past of one of the main characters. That’s always annoying to me. I try to make my characters have unique issues. Nothing related to the cases. Usually.

    • Clarissa – It is interesting, isn’t it, how television shows use that plot element so often. I’m not sure whether they do so because they know it’ll sell, or whether they do so because they believe “that’s how you do a mystery,” or for some other reason. But that is certainly a trend. I agree with you that characters who have unique issues are a lot more interesting :-) .

  3. Margot, you know how much I love Kinsey Milhone but does she have to end up in mortal danger at the end of EVERY novel? Just once, couldn’t she just solve the case without having a gun stuck in her face?

    • Sarah – LOL! That really is funny. You’re not the only one who thanks that way, either. Putting the sleuth through some things can add to the story, but yes, it can be overdone.

  4. Patti Abbott

    Peter Robinson’s Alan Banks has had a difficult life over the years. I think it really adds to the novels.

    • Patti – Oh, I agree. Robinson has put Alan Banks through more than his share of “the wringer.” Boss problems, home problems, children problems and more. And yet, he handles it. I like that about his character and Robinson does it in such a way that it works well.

  5. There is definitely a fine line there as to how much drama to give the protagonist. I think if it happens time and time again in every book the reader will get tired and no longer care about reading the next new book because it will only be the same as the last. You want them to have some drama and some issues but you want them to be plausible. Great post.

    Mason
    Thoughts in Progress
    Freelance Editing By Mason

    • Mason – Thank you :-) . That is such a well-taken point! Yes, there’s a certain number of things you can put a character through, and it works for a book. But too much? Every book? Yes it does lead, I think, to predictability. And that makes a series more stale than it would be if the sleuth never got pushed at all.

  6. I have read some books where the writing is good but degenerates quickly when the character is put in the ‘superhuman’ situation and comes out relatively unscathed. It’s disappointing, unrealistic and takes away from the writing.

    • H.L. – Interesting and well-taken point! In some cases, the writer may assume that the action itself will carry the reader along, but it doesn’t always do that. You’re quite right that those scenes can degenerate if they’re not handled well.

  7. Oh, yes! This is a very fine line. In good fiction, as I understand it, the protagonist must come out at the end of the novel with some changes made. In order to make those changes, he or she must be pressed – otherwise why change? The trouble with series protagonists is that it does get silly once you begin that game…how will it end if you have to amp it up every book? I like my detective type protagonists to have some problems – a bit of a drinking problem, trouble with too little or too much confidence, and of course, they must, from time to time, experience hubris – but if every book I find out something darker and darker about their past! Well, I’m a psychotherapist, so I don’t need to read that stuff over and over. Miss. Marple never plagued us with her past. Harummph.

    • Jan – LOL! No, Miss Marple doesn’t burden readers with her past. And yet, she does face very real hurdles and Christie handled that well. Miss Marple is elderly, and has to cope with sexism, ageism and the fact that a lot of things are more difficult to do if one’s elderly. She doesn’t ruminate about it, but she is pushed by it.
       
      Your larger point – that some series push this too far – is well-taken. How many dark and horrible things can happen to a protagonist before it’s too much? How much growth has to come at the expensive of those serious problems? Yes, dark things happen to all of us, but it can be more realistic if the protagonist has other kinds of less dramatic problems that push them. As you say, it is such a fine line and I honestly don’t know exactly where it is. But it’s there.

  8. I think Kinsey Millhone’s problems whether to accept her found family or not are plenty, but at least the danger she often finds herself in is a realistic outcome of the story. Also V.I. Warshawski, Sara Paretsky’s heroine is usually in danger, but that is countered by her friends, her landlord, and her dogs who are all very protective of her.

    • Barbara – Right you are about Millhone’s struggles to find a way to fit her family into her life. Facing that past sorrow and dealing with new people who are suddenly family could push anyone to the brink. It’s interesting, too, that you mention V.I. Warshawski. She does get herself in danger a lot, but as you say, she’s helped by her “circle” and of course, her dog. Although she’s had some very bad things happen to her, they’ve “come with the territory” of what she does and she generally bounces back. I think that close group of people in her life makes those dangers much less traumatic for her than they would be if she were truly all alone.

  9. In my current WIP, I’ve slapped my main character with one bad situation after another. I’ll be anxious to see if any agent or editor responses tell me I’ve over-traumatized her and she should be suffering from PTSD. Could be.

    • Pat – Oh, that is an interesting question! I’m interested in your novel, too. The more you mention about it, the more interesting it seems. I think sometimes that it really is hard to decide how much we’ll do to our characters…

  10. I agree with all the previous commenters, it’s a fine, fine balance. Pat’s comment made me laugh! I worry about too much drama tipping over into melodrama and the plot of homicidal maniac following the mc around gets old pretty fast. (Yes, I used an old phrase on purpose. I was attempting wit.)

    • Elspeth – LOL! And your humour worked, too :-) . You’re quite right that it’s sometimes difficult to know exactly where that line is between a good story and melodrama. And what makes it all the more challenging is that that line is different for different readers. And yeah, I get tired of the sleuth being chased around by a crazed murderer, myself. These days it has to be very well done for me to be interested…

  11. kathy d.

    Good topic.
    V.I. Warshawski has fallen into the Chicago canal, gotten chased, beaten up, shot at and more. Yet she always bounces back and never loses her nerve or zip.
    Sharon McCone, Marcia Muller’s tough p.i., has also seen a lot of stress and physical danger, which gets worse with each book. In Locked-In, an interesting book McCone is injured and totally paralyzed yet can think. She’s hospitalized throughout the book. She recovers. It’s a good book.
    Many p.i.’s are now in danger or are severely hurt. I think plots are just getting more elaborate, more thriller-like with lots more violence and gore, than the old whodunit puzzles were.
    However, one character whom you mention, Asa Larsson’s main character, Rebecka Martinsson was too abused for my taste. First she is horrible injured at the end of book I, and then in book II, she is beaten and so traumatized that she has a break-down. The ending of that book nearly gave me PTSD and I swore not to read about her ever again. But I read book III and thought the ending too overdone, too dramatic, bringing in global conflicts. This is Sweden! Are other countries’ armies really there in conflict, together with European wealthy gangsters and conspirators. It was too far-fetched for me but at least Martinsson wasn’t hit with a grenade or rocket launcher or kidnapped. But lots of other people were decimated. Is this really necessary today?

    • Kathy – You make a really interesting point. It’s quite possible that today’s books do push sleuths more often and closer to the edge than books of the past. Certainly in Åsa Larsson’s Rebecka Martinsson/Anna-Maria Mella series, Martinsson goes through an awful lot of trauma. Whether or not it’s too much depends on one’s taste, but there’s no doubt she suffers. Books today are also often more graphic than they used to be, so not only are sleuths sometimes pushed more, but their trials are told in more detail. Are books more elaborate and thriller-like? Some are. I’ve definitely read some lately that are, in my opinion, overdone.
       
      That said, though, I think there are still plenty of books where the plot focuses on a whodunit mystery rather than the “thriller” aspects. It’s an interesting question, though. Are we more tolerant of pushing sleuths to the edge, of more elaboration, of more “thriller” than we were? We might be…

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s