From a Distance*

One of the real challenges of being a sleuth, whether real or fictional, is keeping one’s distance, so to speak, and being objective. Sleuths have to keep a certain amount of distance between themselves and others because it protects them from what they see and sometimes have to do. But on the other hand, a sleuth who never gets close to anyone can quickly become a stereotyped caricature. What’s really interesting is that you can see the way fictional sleuths strike that balance by the way they live. There are a number of fictional sleuths who live alone and like it that way, but who do also have friends, family and romantic partners.

For example, two of Agatha Christie’s most famous sleuths, Hercule Poirot and Miss Marple, do not marry. They live alone and prefer it that way. They keep a kind of distance between themselves and others in that way. And yet, they’re not what you would call isolated. For instance, Christie’s fictional detective Ariadne Oliver is a friend of Poirot’s, and in more than one novel, the two of them help one another on cases. You can see, too, that they like and respect each other. There are other references, too, to friends Poirot has made. For instance, in Hallowe’en Party, Poirot makes reference to his friend Solomon “Solly” Levy, with whom he plans to debate some real-life criminal cases. Instead, Mrs. Oliver brings him an even more intriguing problem. Miss Marple is quite similar in that she lives alone and likes it that way. She, too, keeps a certain distance from others. And yet, she certainly has friends and relations. In fact, in 4:50 From Paddington (AKA What Mrs. McGillicuddy Saw!), it’s her friend Elspeth McGillicuddy who draws her into a case of murder and greed.

John D. MacDonald’s Travis McGee has a similar balance. He lives alone on a boat called The Busted Flush, and for the most part, he likes it that way. He cares about his clients and isn’t dispassionate about them, but he does keep his distance. And yet, he’s not isolated. In The Empty Copper Sea, he meets Gretel Howard, with whom he falls very much in love and in fact, they marry. Tragically, he loses her in The Green Ripper to a mysterious illness. When it turns out that she was murdered, McGee goes on a vengeful search for her killer. McGee also has other close connections that we learn about in The Lonely Silver Rain, but no spoilers here ;-) . McGee also has friends and acquaintances who matter to him, so he’s not what you’d call completely “a loner.” Yet he does generally keep his distance from others.

So, in her way, does Sue Grafton’s Kinsey Millhone. In many ways, Millhone keeps her distance from others. She lives alone and prefers it that way, and she’s not one for a “settled” family life. And yet, that doesn’t mean that she’s isolated. She’s friends with her landlord Henry Pitts and with Rose, the owner of her favourite local restaurant. She’s had romantic relationships as well, including two marriages. She’s able to form bonds with people and she does care about her friends – and her clients. But at the same time, she keeps herself at a certain distance.

That’s also true, you could say, of Andrea Camilleri’s Salvo Montalbano. Montalbano lives alone and most of the time he likes it that way, especially since he’s got his housekeeper Adelina to cook for him. He keeps people at a distance and that helps him in his work, especially since he really does care about the cases he investigates. He’s very much devoted to his job, so he doesn’t make time in his life to get close to people. But that doesn’t mean he’s “a loner.” He has a long-term relationship with Livia Burlando and genuinely does have feelings for her. He also has other close relationships, too, such as his friendships with race-car driver Ingrid Sjostrom and journalist Nicolò Zito. Montalbano is more than sociable enough but even so, he does manage to keep the world at arm’s length.

So does Ely Griffiths’ Ruth Galloway. She’s a forensic archaeologist who lives and works in north Norfolk. On one hand, Galloway is certainly not isolated. She loves her daughter Kate (and her cats), and wouldn’t trade motherhood away. She’s had more than one romantic relationship too. She has friends, too, and does care about them. But she also keeps the world at what you might call arm’s length. She’s not in a big hurry to marry and “settle down.” She likes her house and her life the way they are (although of course, juggling parenthood and her work is a challenge). She doesn’t allow herself to get particularly close to a lot of people, and that’s how she prefers things.

That’s how Kerry Greenwood’s Corrina Chapman is, too. She lives and works in a large Melbourne apartment building called Insula. Insula has more than its share of eccentric and interesting tenants, and Chapman cares about them all. They’ve formed what you could almost call a family. Chapman’s a caring, compassionate person, too, and she does enjoy the company of her friends. She enjoys her relationship with her lover Daniel Cohen, too, as well as the company of her cats. So in that sense, she definitely reaches out to the world. And yet, Chapman lives alone and is content that way. She keeps a certain distance, you might say, even from her friends. She very much likes her private space.

Many really fine fictional sleuths are like that. It’s not that they’re stereotypical “can’t-connect-with-people” loners. Rather, they keep a certain distance between themselves and the world. In part, it’s because of what they have to do and what they see. In part it’s because of their absorption in their work. And the best sleuths are self-confident people anyway. So perhaps there’s also an argument that they are content with themselves as they are. But what do you think? Which of your favourite sleuths keeps this kind of distance (I know I’ve missed out several)?

 

 
 

*NOTE: The title of this post is the title of a Bette Midler song.

25 Comments

Filed under Agatha Christie, Andrea Camilleri, Elly Griffiths, John D. MacDonald, Kerry Greenwood, Sue Grafton

25 Responses to From a Distance*

  1. Patti Abbott

    A gregarious detective is the rarity. I can come up with few save Dalziel.

  2. kathy d.

    I agree about Ruth Galloway, Kinsey Millhone and Salvo Montalbano. I think that Corinna Chapman, a great character, is a bit more gregarious.
    Also, Erlendur is a bit of a loner, preoccupied with his childhood trauma and difficulties with his children and ex-spouse. He stays pretty detached. Commissaire Adamsberg of the Paris police is also a loner, though he has friends, but he can’t save his personal life and have people too close.
    With women, I think there is an independence issue strongly at play.

    • Kathy – There are definitely degrees of keeping people at a distance. I agree, for instance, that Erlendur keeps people at a greater distance than does Chapman. And Adamsberg also keeps people at a greater distance than some of the others.
       
      And you’ve brought up a fascinating point about women and independence. I don’t have the data to really support it, but it wouldn’t surprise me at all if you were right. Thanks for that insight.

  3. Margot: What is striking to me, about what I believe is the significant majority of fictional sleuths, is the absence of children. In almost all of your examples I am not aware of any children. There appears a general reluctance to have children a part of a sleuth’s life. At times it has seemed unnatural for so many sleuths to be childless.

    • Bill – Now, that’s really interesting you would bring that up. There are, of course, many sleuths who are parents. Donna Leon’s Guido Brunetti, Åsa Larsson’s Anna-Maria Mella, Arnaldur Indriðason’s Inspector Erlendur and Ely Griffiths’ Ruth Galloway are parents, among others. And yet you’ve got a well-taken point that many, many sleuths do not have children. Or they have them but they’ve moved away and aren’t a part of the stories. It may be reluctance on the part of the author; it’s not easy to write believable domestic scenes within the context of a good, gripping mystery. Or it may be that sleuths are so focused on their work that they don’t make room in their lives for children. Whatever is the explanation, it’s an interesting point…. Hmm….I feel another post coming on…Thanks :-) .

  4. I must be getting better Margot – I’ve actually recognised your last two song titles!
    Many ficitonal detectives I’m afraid get much less interesting after they are married. Peter Wimsey for example is much better when he is pursuing Harriet Vane than after he marries her. Ditto Roderick Alleyn/Agatha Troy. And poor Watson’s lovely wife dies so that he can get back to Baker Street with the archtypal celibate Shelock Holmes.

    • Sarah – LOL! I think that’s great (about the songs). You make a really interesting point about what happens when sleuths get married. There is a certain undercurrent of tension when a sleuth is pursuing a romantic interest. And when sleuths are single, even if they have love interests, they can much more easily go wherever a case takes them, whenever that happens. Not so easy when a sleuth is married.

  5. kathy d.

    Helene Tursten’s Inspector Irene Huss has teenage daughters, and her spouse is often the parent at home with them, but there is a happy family life — thankfully, amidst the angst, alcoholism and depression of many sleuths, especially single men.
    The infamous Martin Beck has children as well. Elinborg in Indridason’s Outrage has a (mostly) happy family life, and her spouse is often home when she is out investigating.
    The issue is also who is the caregiver. Sleuths aren’t home that much, so there has to be another parent who is home more.
    Single parent sleuths aren’t easily able to juggle all of this, so someone else has to be around to help out.
    Nina Reilly, a sleuth-attorney in Perri O’Shaughnessy’s books has a child, but there are other relatives around to help out.
    Michael Connelly’s Harry Bosch and Mickey Haller each have a daughter. Both daughters were primarily cared for by their mothers, but Bosch’s situation radically changed.
    So there has to be a family setting or other relatives around. This is anathema to the lone detective persona, but there are many who do have families in one way or another.

    • Kathy – I like Irene Huss’ home life, too. Åsa Larsson’s Inspector Anna-Maria Mella also has a good home life and I do like that. You’re quite right as well that if a sleuth has children, this complicates things, especially if the sleuth is single. It can work out really well and add to the plot. But it certainly does add “wrinkles” to the sleuth’s daily life.

  6. You have such great examples here, I can’t think of a sleuth. The lack of a spouse or mate for a sleuth leaves for interesting plots involving others and how they are or aren’t involved in the current case.

    Mason
    Thoughts in Progress

    • Mason – That’s something that can add to a mystery, too. When the sleuth isn’t married–with-children, it’s much easier to believe the sleuth suspecting just about everyone (including her or his current flame, if there one). That can add to the story, but it’s just not as believable if the sleuth’s married.

  7. I like some of the family sleuths (eg Tursten) but it helps if they have problems (eg Marklund)! I agree that the loner is the right place for the sleuth to be, on the whole – a kind of mirror to the reader (another loner, at least at the time of reading the book).

    • Maxine – I like the way you put that – a mirror to the reader. That’s exactly what the sleuth is, if you think about it. So she or he has to keep a certain distance from others. And realistically, that would make for some problems at home (i.e. Marklund’s Annika Bengtzon). So would the kind of intense determination to “catch the bad guy” that characterises some of the really good sleuths.

  8. I think of Richard Jury and Melrose Plant who have lots of friends but don’t have the vulnerability of a detective with family that might be put in danger. V. I. Warshawski is another. Interesting thought that they get less interesting after marriage and in that respect I think of Anna Pigeon, Nevada Barr’s highly independent National Park Ranger. An exception was Spenser since he had a monogamous relationship with Susan Silverman, but they didn’t marry because Susan didn’t think she could bear worrying about him if he were her husband. Frankly, I don’t see the difference – she loved him. But Jesse Stone is definitely alone.

    • Barbara – You’re quite right about Stone. He’s most definitely alone in life, despite the relationships that he has. I’m glad you brought up Warshawski, Jury and Plant as well. All of them have friends and acquaintances who care about them. But they do keep a certain amount of distance from others.
       
      It is interesting about Anna Pigeon, isn’t it? Before she re-marries, she is indeed a highly independent woman. In my opinion, Barr writes her character very deftly, so I don’t object to Pigeon’s character evolution. But there’s no doubt that she changes after she re-marries.

  9. I agree with Sarah that many sleuths lose their appeal when they throw off their loner persona and get too wrapped up with a significant other or spouse. I guess it makes them too normal? On the other hand, when you find an entertaining friend- and family-loving sleuth like Mike Befeler’s Paul Jacobson, it’s hard to argue in favor of the loner.

    • Pat – You make a very good point. Perhaps a sleuth who gets wrapped up in someone else almost seems too tame, if I may use that word. or perhaps that person loses part of the “spark of individuality” that’s so appealing in the first place. Still, as you say, when it’s done well, it can certainly add a new dimension to a character. I don’t see Jacobsen in the role of a loner…

  10. Can you imagine seeing death everyday? And then having to bring that home? I couldn’t imagine a spouse that would want to hear the frustration and gory details. Nor would I like to be a spouse of a police officer that works the long hours without much reward. It’s probably the reason most detectives either are single or have rough marriages. I think Barnaby is the only exception.

    • Clarissa – No doubt about it; it would be very difficult to live that way, or to live with someone who had that kind of life. As you say, there may be very good reasons for which a lot of sleuths are unmarried. Carolyn Graham’s Tom Barnaby has a wife (Joyce) who deals with it, and a few other sleuths do, too (e.g. Ruth Rendell’s Reg Wexford’s wife DOra). But it’s hard to do…

  11. kathy d.

    I was thinking about V.I. Warshawski in response to this post, but I dd not add her to the list of loner-sleuths or those who distance themselves from people. She is very close to Dr. Lotte Hershel. She has a friend in Mr. Contreras. And she also has intricate personal relationships with her male partners. In asomewhat recent book, she had ended a relationship which had been written about in prior books. And then she became involved with a tenant in her residence.
    So, although she doesn’t have a family, I don’t see her as a loner per se, although she is very independent. If anyone threatened her independence, she would split quickly. That is too important to her.

    • Kathy – You’re quite right that it’s not easy to characterise Warshawski. She’s not, as you say, a loner. But at the same time, she doesn’t have exactly the kind of interdependence that people do who are married, say, with children. She’s actually a very interesting character that way.

    • Kathy – You’re quite right that it’s not easy to characterise Warshawski. She’s not, as you say, a loner. But at the same time, she doesn’t have exactly the kind of interdependence that people do who are married, say, with children. She’s actually a very interesting character that way.

  12. Good theme, again! I stepped out of the box to think about this one and came up with a sleuth more real than fictional — tough-as-nails Moscow police investigator Arkady Renko created by Martin Cruz Smith. Renko fights a lonely battle against all that is wrong in Soviet communist society — lies, deception, corruption, and murder. Renko is a very capable detective who allows nothing, not even his buried emotions, stand between him and his fight for justice. But he also has a soft, romantic, and compassionate side to him, as evident in GORKY PARK. You’ll like Renko even though he keeps his distance from you.

    • Prashant – Oh, that is a fine suggestion. I like Arkady Renko very much, actually. He is as you say compassionate in his way – he’s not totally unfeeling at all. And yet he does keep his distance from just about everyone. He does the same thing in The Polar Star.

Thanks for stopping by. Please leave a comment as I'd love to get your views.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s