Welcome to another edition of In The Spotlight. Many crime fiction novels are written by authors who identify themselves as crime writers. But sometimes, an author who’s written other kinds of novels writes a crime novel that then becomes very highly regarded. Such an author is Peter Høeg. He’s written several different kinds of novels, some of which explore relationships, some of which explore religion, and some of which explore the roles of ethics and science. Today, let’s take a close look at his contribution to the world of crime fiction. Let’s turn the spotlight on Miss Smilla’s Feeling For Snow.
The novel begins at a funeral for a young boy Isaiah Christiansen, a Greenlander who now lives in Copenhagen with his widowed mother. One of the people at the funeral is Smilla Jaspersen, herself a Greenlander who’s half Inuit, half Danish. The official story of Isaiah’s death is that he was playing on the roof of the building where he lived and had a tragic fall. Jaspersen, who lives in the same building, is drawn to the roof where the accident happened. When she gets to the roof and begins to look around, though, she gets a strong sense that Isaiah Christiansen’s death was not an accident. She grew up in Greenland and understands snow and ice, and what the snow on the roof tells her is that something or someone drove the boy off the roof; he wasn’t playing, he was fleeing. But Jaspersen doesn’t get an awful lot of support for the complaint she files, although a police inspector does interview her.
Jaspersen isn’t satisfied with the explanation and begins to dig deeper. Bit by bit, she finds out a little about Isaiah’s past. It turns out his father died during an expedition to Greenland – an expedition Isaiah had joined. So Jaspersen begins to look into the circumstances of the expedition. That’s when she attracts the attention of some very unpleasant and highly-placed people. First, she gets a visit from a police officer who basically threatens her with prison if she keeps digging into the case. Then, she’s nearly killed when she tries to visit one of the people who was on that expedition. That doesn’t stop her for long, though, and she continues to search for answers.
Along the way, Jaspersen gets help from some unlikely sources. One source is Elsa Lübing, who worked for many years as the secretary to a shipping company that plays a key role in the novel. Another, is mechanic Peter Føjl, one of Jaspersen’s neighbours, who had also befriended Isaiah. Finally, Jaspersen puts the pieces together and figures out what the expedition (and a few before it) was about, and how it connects with Isaiah Christiansen’s death and that of another person. Her conclusions lead Jaspersen to a new expedition on which she finagles a place as a maid/cleaner. It’s on that journey that she finds out the truth about the expeditions and deaths and in the end, she gets the answers she’s been searching for.
One of the most important elements in this novel is the character of Smilla Jaspersen. In some ways, she’s an unlikely sleuth. She’s not particularly fond of people and she doesn’t usually get involved in others’ lives. She’s not a detective or private investigator. In many ways, there’s no reason for her to be involved in the case at all. But Jaspersen is a scientist. She understands physics, mathematics, snow and ice. She is also intuitive. Her Inuit background has given her a deep sense of the land and the way people and land interact. She has, as she puts it, “a feeling for snow.” And she’s made a personal commitment to find out what happened to Isaiah. Finally, she is as dogged a character as any other in fiction. Here, in fact, is what one character says about her:
“You were supposed to be kept out of this but you kept on getting involved. You were supposed to be left behind in Copenhagen, but suddenly you wound up on board. You keep popping up.”
Those qualities make her very believable as the sleuth. We learn Jaspersen’s backstory little by little as the novel evolves, and as we do, we see why she is the way she is. She’s been done down, placed in boarding schools, shipped to Denmark with other young people from Greenland, and in other ways treated badly by “the system.” It’s to Høeg’s credit that she’s not painted as a “tragic heroine.” In fact, she’s courageous, quick-thinking and not above what amounts to blackmail to get information and help she needs. She’s far from helpless. Still, it’s little wonder Jaspersen has no great love for people nor any deep attachments. She’s got a fascinating and unusual perspective.
Another important element in this novel is the setting. The reader is placed in several different locations as the story progresses, and each one is described so that the reader is really there (I know it’s cliché but in this case it works). One of those settings is Copenhagen. Interestingly enough, we see Denmark through the eyes of an “outsider,” as Jasperson doesn’t really consider herself Danish. In fact, she has no great love of living in Denmark, although there are, she admits, good things about it. Here’s one description of part of Copenhagen:
“Frederiksberg, the area around Genforeningspladen, Brønshøj – the snow makes it all look like a village. Hejrevej is short and narrow. It runs into Duevej.”
And here’s what Jaspersen has to say about Danish bureaucracy:
“For many Greenlanders, the most difficult thing about Denmark is the paperwork. The state bureaucracy’s front line of paper: application forms, documents, and official correspondence with the proper public authorities. There is a certain elegant and delicate irony in the fact that even a practically illiterate life like Julianne’s [Isaiah Christiansen’s mother] has sloughed off this mountain of paper.”
Through Jaspersen, Høeg shows us Denmark, warts and all as the saying goes.
We also get a sense of Greenland and that part of the Arctic:
“We’ve reached a flat, windswept plateau. A series of regular crevasses opens up before us. We must have reached the ablation zone, that spot where the glacier’s lower layers move up towards the surface. There’s a knob ofrock that has parted the flow of ice. I didn’t notice it from below because it’s some type of white stone. Now it gleams in the gathering gloom.”
And interestingly enough, many of Jasperson’s descriptions of Greenland include the Inuit words for different kinds of ice and snow. It’s obvious that she identifies clearly with that side of her culture.
The mystery itself is believable, especially once we know who’s behind the deaths and what the motive is. It’s not the kind of motive most of us would have for murder, but given the killer, it makes sense. And no, the killer isn’t a psychopathic serial killer.
The pace of the novel has some elements of the thriller in the sense that the action, when it happens, happens quickly. There’s a very, very effective twist at the end, too. That said, though, there is also a great deal of reflection in the novel. Smilla Jaspersen is a philosopher and she does quite a lot of thinking. It’s not really rumination though, and doesn’t hold back the pace of the novel. Oh, and one more note about the mystery itself. We do find out who the killer is and what the motive is. But there are certain elements in the story that do not have “neat endings.” Readers who want all of the “loose ends” tied up may be disappointed in that. But the reader is not left in doubt as to why and how the deaths happened and who is behind everything.
An interesting mystery that takes place in a distinctive group of settings, Miss Smilla’s Feeling For Snow features an unusual and fascinating sleuth. It also features some strong social commentary on “haves” and “have-nots,” on Danish/Greenlander relations and on life itself. But what’s your view? Have you read Miss Smilla’s Feeling For Snow? If you have, what elements do you see in it?
Coming Up On In The Spotlight
Monday 19 March/Tuesday 20 March – Deadly Appearances – Gail Bowen
Monday 26 March/Tuesday 27 March – The Case of the Velvet Claws – Erle Stanley Gardner
Monday 2 April/Tuesday 3 April – Don’t Look Back – Karin Fossum













I have not read the book but have seen the movie and liked it. The story is not one of those that you completely figure out half way through. Part of the appeal comes from watching Smilla work her way through the mystery and being just as baffled as she is.
Peter – That’s one of the appeals of the story for me, too. Readers follow along as Smilla Jaspersen figures out the mystery. What I like too is that she’s quite bright (so we can respect her), but she’s not omniscient (so we can believe her). And yes, that also leaves the reader baffled at times, but not in what I’d call an unfair way.
For many of us in Australia this was our first introduction to Scandinavian crime fiction. Also to the idea of reading translated work although of course we already had Simenon’s Maigret, but this was so different!
Kerrie – Oh, yes, this one is quite different to Simenon isn’t it? And I think for a lot of people, this is the novel that introduced them to Scandinavian crime fiction. It’s developed so much in the last twenty years, but this is definitely a groundbreaking example of it.
Even though the ending was a bit disappointing, I was very impressed by this novel by an author who was relatively unknown before ´Miss Smilla´. As you say, she is far from ´tragic´; I remember her clearly for the stubborn way she sticks her nose into everything – because she cared about the little boy who died.
Some Danes claim Peter Høeg shows off his knowledge, and I suppose you could say it is true in a couple of his books, but in this one I just enjoyed learning about the Inuit culture and their feeling for snow
So thank you for a terrific post that reminded me of a terrific book. I must read it again one day.
Dorte – I like it, too, so much, that Smilla Jasperson is not tragic and doesn’t want to be pitied. I really do like that about her. She is so determined and yes, stubborn, and simply does not give up. And I admire her quick wits and sharp tongue, too. Under the circumstances, you just have to admire her ability to stand up for herself and for the memory of the little boy.
.
Høeg is certainly knowledgeable, but in this novel, I don’t get the sense of him showing off. Instead I get the sense that he is trying to share something with the reader that he finds interesting. I didn’t get a sense of him being a know-all from the novel. And as you say, I do like the Inuit culture’s “feeling for snow.”
Thanks for the kind words and this is definitely one to be re-read…
This blew me away at the time. Not sure why but it seemed very different.
Patti – It really is a different kind of book isn’t it? I can see why it blew you away; it’s a powerful novel.
I started to watch the movie one time — and by the way I like “feeling” for snow better than “sense” of snow! — but quit because I thought I knew the answer. Ooops, better look at it again.
Karen – I like the Feeling For… title better than the Sense of… title, too. I think it expresses the intuition better. I hope you get the chance to read the book or to see the movie again; it’s a powerful story I think. And it has its share of surprises…
Like!
Karen – Thanks
. That’s kind of you. And isn’t it a great story!?
Haven’t read it but it sounds intriguing. The protagonist sounds like someone you would want to know. Thanks for another interesting book to add to my wish list.
Mason
Thoughts in Progress
Mason – Oh, I think you would want to know Smilla Jaspersen. She’s a fascinating character, and I think you’d like the book.
Margot: I thought it was a remarkable book. I was fascinated by Smilla.
I agree with Dorte about disappointment in the ending. I thought it was the weakest part of a very good book.
I like “sense” in the title better than “feeling”. As someone who lives in a land with snow at least half the year – there remains snow outside my home today and 10-15 cm more is expected tonight – I will claim a fair knowledge of snow. I think of Smilla’s sense in terms of the sensation of snow. Her observations and conclusions about snow are based less on intuition than on experience with snow. As an example I have a sense of snow from how it looks and reacts when walked upon. On a cold day – something below -30C – there is a unique crunch to the snow. She may not put every sense of snow in scientific terms but her conclusions about snow are fact based.
Bill – Thanks for sharing your thinking about having a sense of snow. You’re right that when one lives in a place where there is a lot of snow, one gets a lot experience with and thus a sense of snow. It is, as you say, an experience- and fact-based understanding of different kinds of snow and what different kinds of snow are likely to mean. Well-taken point.
And you’re by no means the only person who thought the ending of Miss Smilla’s Feeling For Snow was disappointing. It’s not the ending one would expect. But then, this isn’t a “typical” novel (if there is such a thing). That said, though, I have to admit I didn’t think the ending was the strongest part of the novel either. Still, overall, it is, as you say, a remarkable book.
I liked this book a lot, especially learning about the Inuit people and the relationship of Denmark to Greenland, an eye-opening read. I thought that the book was great for the first 3/4 and then that it turned into an espionage thriller, which was not thrilling to me. But I enjoyed the book overall and remember when I read it, that several mystery readers I know were also reading it and liked it.
Kathy – The relationship of Denmark to Greenland, and the Inuit people to the Danish people, really interested me too in this novel. I enjoy novels where I can learn something as well as follow the mystery, and the novel certainly does give one a sense of the Inuit culture and what life is like for them. Lots of people share your disappointment at the end of the novel; it certainly goes in a different direction, so to speak. But I’m glad that overall you enjoyed the novel. It is an unusual one.
I haven’t seen the movie, but from the reviews it was somewhat different from, and not as good as, the book (unsurprisingly in either case)!
I too like this book a lot, it was huge in the UK and really kick-started the interest here in Scandinavian crime fiction. The publisher who commissioned the translation (by Tiina Nunnally as Felicity David) is Christopher MacLehose, who went on to introduce English-language readers to Henning Mankell and others, in more recent times, under hisown imprint for Quercus, Stieg Larsson’s Millennium trilogy (translated by Tiina’s husband Steve Murray ad Reg Keeland).
Although Sjowall and Wahloo had been translated perviously (and many other crime novels of course), none of them had the same impact as Miss Smilla.
Returning to Miss Smilla, I think this book was so popular with readers in the UK was that it was not a forumulaic crime novel – before that most crime novels were standard fare in a few categories – but opened people’s eyes to the possibilities of atmosphere, location, characterisation, psychology, politics and more, within a plot-based (crime) context to provide a framework to the plot. Like Lisbeth Salander, Miss Smilla is a female protagonist who is very different from the usual couple of cliched ways women in fiction are presented. I remember being disappointed in the pesudoscientific ending of the book but loving the rest of it – I have long been meaning to re-read it (it was one of my choices for Kim’s Triple Choice Tuesday at her blog Reading Matters) and perhaps I really will get around to it now.
Maxine – Thanks very much for that background information on the translation of the novel and its publication in the U.K. I didn’t know those “behind the scenes” details and they’re really interesting!
You’re quite right too that this is not a formulaic crime novel. It takes risks, explores all sorts of themes and focuses, as you say on politics, psychology and chracterisation within the “crime plot” context. Little wonder that it became so popular. And yes, neither Smilla Jaspersen nor Lisbeth Salander is a “typical” female fictional character. That too makes this novel absolutely fascinating I think.
And it’s so interesting that you mention disappointment in the end of the novel. As it’s easy to see from everyone’s comments, that’s the one part/aspect of the novel that people have found to be disappointing. The ending certainly takes the book in a different direction, and lots of people were not happy with that direction. It’s not my favourite aspect of the novel either, to be truthful. But overall, the novel is one of the few that I would call groundbreaking.
Thanks for your kind words, Margot, and a retrospective apology for all those typos in my comment above your reply- I was in too much of a rush! I agree completely that this is one of crime fiction’s groundbreakers.
Maxine – No worries at all. You should see some of the stuff I’ve written. Really. And I’m always honoured when you comment.
I haven’t read this, but it’s been on my list for a while since another time you mentioned it. It sounds like the author has managed to skilfully work in his own knowledge and/or research without info dumping. An impressive feat, in my opinion.
Sarah – Oh, absolutely! It isn’t easy at all to avoid “dumping,” and in this case, that doesn’t happen. There’s plenty of interesting information about the Inuit, about snow, ice and glaciers and more. but it is woven through the novel. I do hope you’ll get a chance to read this; it’s remarkable in a lot of ways I think.
Interesting! I like stories where you’re not sure at first if it was an accident or a crime. And this one sounds complex and tough to figure out. I’ll put it on my list.
Elizabeth – It is both complex and tough to figure out. And it features one of the unique protagonists I’ve read about in crime fiction. It’s not light reading – not something to read on the beach. But it’s a ground-breaking book in a lot of ways, and it’s an absorbing story. I hope you’ll get the chance to read it.
I haven’t read this one but have just added it to my TBR list. There are people who will pursue a cause or an investigation in spite of all threats to their safety and well being. They are very brave, and sometimes very foolish, but certainly admirable. Smilla Jasperson is a character I’d like to meet.
Pat – I think you’d like to meet her, too. Not only is she absolutely determined to find out the truth about the deaths in this novel, but she’s simply a very interesting person. She’s brilliant, intuitive, certainly has faults but overall, a fascinating person. I hope you’ll enjoy the read.
I haven’t read this book but the murder of a child always attracts me to a story, not because I like the murder of children but because I want to see the case solved. Thanks for this review.
Clarissa – I know what you mean. There’s an added urgency to a story isn’t there when a child is the victim. I think you’d really like the protagonist in this story, too. She’s a very strong person with a fascinating outlook on life.
This book was groundbreaking in many ways. In all of my mystery reads, some books stand out. This one does that. Also, I had never read crime fiction or any adult fiction set in Denmark, nor any others giving some of the history of Greenland.
This was published in the days before the Internet so one could only get information the old-fashioned way — in books, newspapers or magazines. The Internet made it possible to search out information about nearly any topic, but that book was a real eye-opened for me and several friends.
Kathy – Right you are. This book really does break the mould in several ways and that’s why it stands out. And it is interesting isn’t it how such a relatively short time ago, there was no internet. You had to do research, as you say, the old-fashioned way. And that was really only 20-25 years ago. Times change quickly.
A great crash course in ice core technology. That part of it, the unusual setting and all the snow and ice talk was fascinating to me. It had some great action set pieces, good villains and a tough heroine. That’s enough for me. I liked it a lot but I don’t think I’d have the patience to read it again; I remember it being a bit of a chore to get through.
I also remember seeing the movie trailer for the first time in a packed theater. When the title of the movie was announced at the very end by one of those gravelly voiced narrators trying to sound tough and scary (I can duplicate it perfectly and wish you could hear me do it) nearly the entire audience (not me) burst into laughter. I could tell who Wasn’t going to see the movie.
John – I can just picture you doing that voice; I know exactly what you mean. You’re probably right, too, about who wasn’t going to see the film. And yes, the novel has solid action, a terrific strong protagonist, and some fascinating settings. The novel is a little reflective so it takes some mulling over, but it is an excellent book I think.
Margot I havent’t read this yet, but I’ve heard of it over the years under the old title. Didn’t see the film either. So I’ll be coming to it with fresh eyes.
Your enthusiastic review really gave me a ‘feeling’ for the book itself. I am adding it to my list as we speak.
Yvette – Oh, thank you
. I’m glad you enjoyed the review, and I hope you’ll enjoy the novel. It’s not a light, easy read, but it is unique and compelling. And I’ll be interested to hear what you think after reading it with fresh eyes.
The film was aggressively dumb, which (unfairly) put me off the novel, so I should probably give the book a try (the US ad campaign also was mightily condescending toward Mere Crime Fiction, which this was supposedly much more sophisticated than, another turnoff…particularly in tandem with a film that has Smilla walking for hours across the icecap without bothering to put her hood up, and the like).
I will give it a chance eventually…I hope the translation into English is decent.
Todd – I always think it’s such a shame when a movie puts one off a novel. I really do hope you get to read this one, as it has, I think, a lot to recommend it. And I agree; a film that takes place in the polar regions that doesn’t involve people bundling up appropriately does make one question….