I Remember Watchin’ You Once Upon a Time*

An excellent book review from Maxine at Petrona (a superb blog you really should follow closely if you don’t already) has got me thinking about what happens in crime fiction when characters from one novel come back in another. I’m not talking here of protagonists or “regulars” in a series. Rather, I mean individuals who are involved in a particular case who come back in a later novel. When it’s done well, that plot point can give readers a sense of closure; we learn what ended up happening to a character and that can be interesting. It also gives readers a sense of the continuity of a series and that can make the series that much more believable.

For example, in Agatha Christie’s Mrs. McGinty’s Dead, Hercule Poirot travels to the village of Broadhinny when Superintendent Spence asks him to investigate the murder of a charwoman. The evidence in the murder pointed to her unpleasant lodger James Bentley, but Spence has begun to believe that Bentley may be innocent. Poirot agrees to see what he can do and goes to Broadhinny where the murder took place. During his stay there, he lodges at Long Meadows, a Guest House run by Maureen and Johnnie Summerhayes. They’re friendly and interesting hosts, but ill-equipped and badly unprepared to run a Guest House. Among the many things Poirot has to cope with at the Summerhayes’ establishment is some of the worst cooking he’s ever encountered. For Poirot this is a true sacrifice. But he survives his stay and finds out who the killer of Mrs. McGinty really is. A few years later in Cat Among the Pigeons, Poirot solves the murder of Grace Springer, games mistress at Meadowbank, an exclusive girls’ school. Springer’s death turns out to be connected to a revolution in the Middle East, a cache of stolen jewels and a kidnapping. One of the pupils at the school is Julia Upjohn. She slowly puts some of the pieces of the puzzle together and decides to visit Poirot and ask him to investigate. She knows of Poirot because her mother is a great friend of Maureen Summerhayes During Julia’s first conversation with Poirot we learn that he did finally teach Maureen how to properly cook at least one thing  – an omelette.

In Maj Sjöwall and Per Wahlöö’s The Laughing Policeman, Martin Beck and his team have their hands full trying to protect the American embassy in Stockholm when a demonstration by a group of anti-war protestors gets ugly. Everyone’s nerves are on edge and the police force is spread too thin. Then to make matters worse, a gunman kills eight people on a bus. One of the victims is Beck’s youngest colleague Ǻke Stenström. At first the murders look like the work of a crazed maniac. But bit by bit, Beck and his team learn that things aren’t as simple as that. At the time of his murder Stenström was working on the “cold case” of Teresa Camarão, a Portuguese woman who’d become a prostitute. That investigation plus the fact that not everyone on the bus was identified put the police on the right track and help them solve this case. One of the characters in this novel is Stenström’s fiancée Åsa Torell. She is grief-stricken by her fiancé’s murder, but that doesn’t mean she’s incapable of helping the police. She’s got the very strong feeling that something isn’t right about this case – that Stenström wasn’t just killed randomly. Her suspicions help fuel the investigation. Torell deals with her grief by becoming a police officer herself, and we see her again in other Martin Beck novels; in fact they have a very brief relationship. Several years later in The Terrorists, the Stenström case comes back to haunt both her and Beck. This time, the team has been assigned to protect a controversial American senator who’s planning a visit to Stockholm. At the same time, the team is investigating the murder of pornographic film-maker Walter Petrus (Valter Pettersson). They’re also involved in the trial of Rebecka Lind, who’s been accused of bank robbery – a robbery she says she didn’t commit. I don’t want to give away spoilers so I’ll just say that this book contains a clear connection to The Laughing Policeman.

Michael Connelly introduces us to L.A.P.D. cop Harry Bosch in The Black Echo. Bosch has recently been demoted from the elite Robbery/Homicide Division to the Hollywood Homicide division because of a shooting incident. He’d been after a serial killer nicknamed The Dollmaker and got important evidence from a prostitute Dixie McCall who’d escaped from that killer. Dixie’s evidence led Bosch to the man’s apartment where he killed The Dollmaker with what he feels was a clean shot. But because he didn’t have a warrant, and because the suspect didn’t turn out to have a weapon at hand, Bosch was investigated by the Internal Affairs Division (IAD) and demoted. The main focus of The Black Echo is the investigation of the murder of Billy Meadows, whose body is found stuffed into a drainpipe. At first that death looks like a junkie’s overdose, but Bosch and his partner Jerry Edgar find that it goes a lot deeper than that; it’s connected to a major bank robbery. The Dollmaker story is woven throughout this novel though and comes back later in The Concrete Blonde. In that novel, Bosch faces a major civil suit by the family of Norman Church, the man Bosch shot in the Dollmaker case. Church’s family claims that Bosch shot the wrong man so now Bosch has to defend his actions on that day. To make matters worse, a dead woman is found with all of the hallmarks of The Dollmaker’s distinctive “signature.” So Bosch also has to face the possibility that he could have been very, very wrong about Norman Church.

In The Cat Who Turned On and Off, Lillian Jackson Braun’s Jim “Qwill” Qwilleran is a features reporter for a big-city newspaper, the Daily Fluxion. He hears about a fascinating part of the city called Junktown and decides to write a feature about it. It’s full of unusual craft shops, antique shops and art galleries and Qwill becomes fascinated with the place. He soon learns that a few months earlier, Andrew “Andy” Glanz, a respected antique dealer and authority, was killed in what looked at the time like a tragic fall. But Qwill soon begins to wonder whether Glanz was murdered. So in the guise of writing a tribute feature about Glanz, he looks into the case. In the end, he’s able to prove that Glanz was murdered and finds out who the killer was. One of the antique dealers Qwill meets in The Cat Who Turned on and Off  is Amberina, one of three sisters who own and run an antique shop in Junktown. It’s not a spoiler to say that Amberina isn’t the killer; she and her sisters do figure into the story though.  A few years later, Qwill moves the small town of Pickax, “four hundred miles north of nowhere.” He’s settled into his life there as a columnist when he gets a call from Amberina. She tells him that the Casablanca, a beloved but decrepit old apartment building in Junktown, will soon be sold to developers unless it can be saved. She invites Qwilleran to spend some time at the Casablanca, hoping that he’ll help publicise the effort to save the building. The penthouse that Qwill takes belonged to artist Dianne Bessinger, who headed the committee to save the Casablanca. Bessinger was recently murdered and Qwill soon suspects that someone in the building was responsible. He discovers that some prominent people in the area wanted Bessinger dead, and slowly finds the connection between her death and the movement to sell the Casablanca.

There are a lot of other novels too – far more than there is space for here – where characters and cases from earlier novels come back for what you might call resolution in later novels. In fact, I’ll bet you could think of many more than I could. It’s got to be done carefully, so as not to bore regular readers nor exclude new readers (or give away spoilers). But when it is done well, this strategy can tie a series together, offer closure and “flesh out” characters. Do you find that this plot theme works for you? If you’re a writer, do any of your characters from one novel re-appear in a later one?

 

 
 

*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from the Foo Fighers’ Resolve.

About these ads

18 Comments

Filed under Agatha Christie, Lilian Jackson Braun, Maj Sjöwall, Michael Connelly, Per Wahlöö

18 Responses to I Remember Watchin’ You Once Upon a Time*

  1. I notice in a lot of crime dramas on TV, this is now required. For example, in Castle, finding the main character’s mom’s killer has been running through four seasons. In the TV series, The Mentalist, finding the killer Red John has been going on for four seasons. In Val McDermid’s latest book The Retribution, an old killer comes back to seek revenge. Sounds like it’s a hit with the fans, so why not?

    • Clarissa – You’ve an interesting point about television crime fiction. I hadn’t thought about it that way, so thanks. It certainly does seem that a lot of series have early characters come back for one reason or another. As you say, the fans like it… And thanks for mentioning Retribution. That’s a good example of what I had in mind.

  2. I’m currently addicted to the Allan Banks series, and one of the things I like most about the book is how characters and situations that played a central role in one novel pop up in subsequent ones. Keeps the series interesting.
    And thank you, Margot, for yet another great post.

    • Natasha – That’s very kind of you :-) And I like that about Peter Robinson’s Alan Banks series, too. Characters, situations and so on do come back in later novels and so we see Banks dealing, if you will, with his history even as he takes another case. It does add interest and it makes for continuity too.

  3. Margot: I think of a couple of series in which a recurring nemesis appeared.

    Sherlock Holmes was challenged by Professor Moriaty.

    Nero Wolfe took on the evil Arnold Zeck in several mysteries.

    It is not done much in contemporary fiction but I like sleuths sometimes being forced to take on a worthy opponent in more than one mystery.

    • Bill – I hadn’t thought specifically of nemeses when I wrote this post but they certainly do return, and a well-written nemesis can add interest to a novel. Moriarty and Zeck are two terrific examples too for which thanks.

  4. Skywatcher

    Margery Allingham was very fond of this. Several characters turn up in one book, then reappear years later in another. I’ll not name him/her, but one repeater turns up originally as a suspect in one case, becomes a best-selling novelist and librettist a few years later in a different story, and finally dies just before the beginning of a third book.

    Guffy Randall, one of Campion’s friends, has a walk on appearance in the first novel, turns up a few years later in an heroic supporting role, gets married, has a daughter who appears in another book, who then presents Randall with a grand-son, who is one of the major characters in one of Allingham’s final novels.

    Friends and relatives swim in and our of our lives, so having fictional characters do the same gives series of novels a feeling of reality.

    • Skywatcher – You’re quite right about real life. People do indeed come in and out of our lives, so there really is no reason that it wouldn’t happen in crime fiction too. And thanks for mentioning Guffy Randall and family. That continuity adds depth I think to the Campion novels.

  5. p881

    It would be a shame to waste a good character on a single appearance. Even if dead, you can prequel them. Patti

  6. They may have nothing to do with resolution of a case, not directly at least, but Miss Felicity Lemon and George come to mind easily as two recurring characters in Christie’s novels. I can think of a few characters in Wodehouse, like Galahad Threepwood, younger brother of Lord Elmsworth, without whom the Blandings Castle series wouldn’t have been as hilarious. However marginal their role, recurring characters often steal the show or in this case the story.

    • Prashant – You bring up some terrific characters from Hercule Poirot’s life! I like it when they pop in and out, too :-) And thank you for reminding me of Wodehouse’s work. Such classic stories aren’t they? And yes, Threepwood does add some welcome humour to those stories.

  7. Recurring fun characters was one reason I loved The Cat Who . . . series. Braun was so good at creating characters. On TV though I’m heartily sick and tired of Red John stories on The Mentalist and who killed Beckett’s mom on Castle.

    • Barbara – I honestly can’t speak to Castle or The Mentalist since I don’t watch them. But I agree that Braun drew some delightfully interesting and quirky characters who pop up more than once in her stories.

  8. Margot, thank you so much for the very kind mention of my blog. I’m most hounoured, thank you again.
    And you have some great examples here – it is a while since I’ve read many of the Rebus novels by Ian Rankin, but I think Big Ger Cafferty appears in one novel and then quite a bit later crops up occasionally in others?
    The Connelly example is great – he does this with other characters, eg Jack McEvoy, the journalist in The Poet, disappears for many novels, then resurfaces again in the book about his last story –The Scarecrow. I think he crops up as a minor character in a couple of others.

    • Maxine – No need at all to thank me – I speak the truth. And right you are about “Big Ger” Cafferty. He does crop up more than once – far too often for Rebus’ liking, that’s for sure.
       
      Thanks too for mentioning Jack McEvoy, whom I forgot to mention. I like his character and yes, he “stars” in The Poet and later, after FBI Agent Rachel Walling breaks up with Harry Bosch (poor guy – worst luck sometimes with women ;-) ) she returns to McEvoy so we do see him (McEvoy) again. I am biased, I’ll admit, but Connelly really is a master at moving characters in and out like that.

  9. I like it when characters come back in books such as the Countess Vera Rossakoff on AC’s books. I miss Henry in Sue Grafton’s books when she doesn’t include him. At CrimeFest she explained that the character can take over if she lets him!

    • Sarah – Oh, I wish I’d been able to hear Garfton’s talk. I’ll bet it was terrific. And I like Henry a lot myself; he’s a terrific character.
       
      Thanks so much too for mentioning the Countess Vera Rossakoff. Such an interesting and flamboyant character. It’s easy to see her appeal to Poirot.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s