In yesterday’s post I mentioned just a few of the technological and other developments we owe to careful scientific research. Without rigourous and painstaking research we wouldn’t have even basics such as electric lights, let alone anything as complex as digital imaging and the geodosic dome. Who are the people who conduct this research? Quite often one doesn’t learn their names unless they win a Nobel prize (and sometimes, let’s face it, not even then). But even those who are more or less anonymous have been the driving force behind many of the things we take for granted. Whether they work in laboratories or in the field, scientists inform our knowledge. That’s one reason it’s refreshing to see them portrayed sympathetically in crime fiction. Oh, and you’ll notice in this post that I am not going to mention the many medical doctors, forensic specialists or computer scientists who play roles in the genre. That’d be too easy.
Two scientists prove to be very important to making a case in Agatha Christie’s Sad Cypress. In that novel Elinor Carlisle is charged with the poisoning death of Mary Gerrard, daughter of the lodgekeeper at the family home of Hunterbury. There’s plenty of evidence against Elinor too and she had at least two motives. For one thing there’s a question of inheritance. Elinor stands to inherit a great deal of money when her wealthy Aunt Laura dies, but Aunt Laura became quite fond of Mary and it was likely she’d leave a considerable amount of money to her instead of to Elinor. There’s also the fact that Elinor’s intended Roderick “Roddy” Welman has become infatuated with Mary. In fact, he and Elinor break up their engagement over the matter. But local GP Dr. Peter Lord is convinced that Elinor is innocent. And even if she’s guilty he wants her name cleared. So he appeals to Hercule Poirot to investigate. Poirot agrees and looks into the matter closely. He finds out who really killed Mary Gerrard and why but of course it requires more than just Poirot’s say-so to win a court case. In the end, testimony from a botanist and a chemist provide the evidence that solves the mystery.
Isaac Asimov’s stories frequently feature scientists as protagonists and/or major characters. I’ll just give one example. In his short story The Dying Night, three scientists Edward Talliaferro, Stanley Kaunas and Battersley Ryger meet at an astronomy conference after not having seen each other for some years. All of them carry a burden because they’ve been far more successful than the fourth member of their group of friends Romero Villers. Villiers’ health made it impossible for him to leave Earth as the other scientists did and build a reputation as a leading astronomer as his friends did. What makes matters even more awkward is that Villiers claims to have made a breakthrough discovery, and plans to present his findings at this conference. His former friends aren’t convinced he’s made the breakthrough he claims to have made and there’s bitterness on both sides. On the night before his scheduled presentation Villiers is killed and critical files relating to his research and discovery have disappeared. Rather than call in the police it’s decided to consult Dr. Wendell Urth, a noted expert on conditions on other planets. He’s also got an unofficial relationship with the police and has been of assistance to them before. He agrees to listen to each scientist’s account of the night of the murder, and from that information he’s able to deduce who the murderer is. And what’s fascinating about this story is that Urth solves the case through his knowledge of the atmosphere and other information about other planets.
Sarah Andrews, herself a geologist, has created a series that features forensic geologist Em Hansen. Hansen is originally from Wyoming and in Tensleep, the first in this series, she’s landed a job as a mudlogger for an oil company. Her job is to collect and analyze mud samples but her work’s complicated by the fact that a lot of her male colleagues don’t think that an oil drilling outfit is the right place for a woman. Then her mentor Bill Kretzmer is killed in what looks at first like a car accident. Everyone thinks Kretzmer’s death is accidental but then another co-worker Willie Sewell is killed, apparently crushed by horses. Hansen doesn’t believe the theory of accident and begins to investigate. As the series moves on, Hansen slowly moves up the ladder, so to speak, even taking a position with the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
In Marilyn Victor’s and Michael Allan Mallory’s Killer Instinct, we meet Lavender “Snake” Jones, zookeeper and documentary host. Jones decides to feature the Minnesota Wolf Institute (MWI) for her show Zoofari. Her friend Gina Brown, a wolf biologist with the MWI, is eager both to spend time with Jones and to have her beloved wolves featured on Zoofari; she’s hoping that a better understanding of wolves will mean fewer people hunting them and needlessly fearing them. Then Brown gets into a conflict with anti-wolf leader Ivar Bjorkland. When Bjorkland is murdered, Brown is suspected of killing him. Even Jones wonders whether her friend might be guilty. But then there are other murders. Jones discovers who’s responsible but she’ll have to stop the killer if she’s to stay alive herself.
There’s also an interesting example of scientists being critical to solving murders in Peg Brantley’s Red Tide. In that novel, banker and rescue dog handler Jamie Taylor is called to a remote field near Aspen Falls, Colorado. There Taylor and her dog along with police authorities discover a set of long-buried remains that are the work of a killer who’s died recently. But when recent remains are also found, it’s clear that another killer is using the same area. The police can’t really make headway on the case because Jamie’s sister ME Jacqueline “Jax” Taylor can’t establish clearly what the cause of death is. That’s when veterinarian Scott Ortiz comes in handy. He’s noticed some unexplained deaths among local horses and does special experiments to find out what the cause of death is. His studies reveal the cause of death among the horses and gives Jax Taylor valuable information in her own search for answers.
And of course no post on scientists in crime fiction would be complete without a mention of Rex Stout’s Theodore Horstmann, the botany expert who works with Nero Wolfe to raise and tend Wolfe’s beloved orchids.
See what I mean? Scientists are valuable folks. Despite the stereotypes you might have heard about “mad scientists” or cold and unfeeling “eggheads,” scientists are interesting and generally very good people. They’re also extremely informative and useful when it comes to crime-solving. Want some more ideas? Check out this post on science in crime fiction from Bernadette at Reactions to Reading, an excellent blog you should be following if you’re not already. Seriously.
*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Billy Joel’s Two Thousand Years.













Interesting post. Since Nero Wolfe and Theodore Horstmann came up here, I’m going to give a plug for the A&E TV episodes with Timothy Hutton and Murray Chaykin. Being up half the night watching these, engrossed and laughing at the wit and idiosyncracies of the “genius” detective and his sidekick, I recommend it highly. If you like these books, do not miss this treat.
Kathy – Thanks for the good news about the series. I’ll definitely have to watch it.
– I was wondering whether it was well-done and it’s good to know that it is.
Great post, Margot – as an ex-scientist and now a “camp follower” (as my old boss, Sir John Maddox, called science journalists and editors), I am very pleased to read your examples (most of which are new to me) of positive portrayals……compared with madman attempting to take over world or unleashing killer virus!
One very good book about science is Intuition by Allegra Goodman – it isn’t a crime novel per se, but the plot is about whether and how someone faked their research so it is quite fascinating, based on a time the author spent in a world-class biomedical lab in Boston (there are so many there I forget which!). And C J Box often portrays scientific themes, eg mining technology and wind farms, in a realistic way in his books, one reason why I like them. Perhaps my favourite “science in crime fiction” novel is Total Eclipse by Liz Rigbey, about an astronomer in California – highly recommended. One of those books that one remembers after many years. And of course there is Miss Smilla’s Feeling for Snow by Peter Hoeg, which had scientific themes that turned out to be a bit crazy.
Maxine – Thank you
– I appreciate the kind words. I like that term camp follower; it’s a good ‘un. Thanks also for mentioning Intuition; I admit I’ve not read that one but I’ve heard that it’s really a solid book. And right you are about C.J. Box’s themes of different forms of geo- and other kinds of earth science. I think that’s part of what makes his novels innovative for me; they are of course crime plots and there is the theme of the outdoors, but that flavour of science is a nice touch. Right you are also about the Rigy and the Høeg, too. Admittedly some of the science themes in Miss Smilla’s… are a little – er – far-fetched. But I do like the scientific information about glaciers.
Oh, and a PS, as I write the Paralympics opening ceremony is on TV: the show was a testament to science, starting with the Big Bang & Stephen Hawking and going via Newton’s Principia to the Higgs Boson made of umbrellas
Maxine – Oh, I love it! Thanks for sharing. What a great use of umbrellas!
I just checked my “science” category archive and found a few more examples, one of which is Jar City by Arnaldur Indridason, and another is the more recent Last Will by Liza Marklund. I hope you won’t mind me posting the link: http://petronareviews.wordpress.com/category/science/ .
Maxine – I’m so glad you mentioned Jar City. I almost did actually, but then at the last minute I didn’t. There’s only ever room for so many examples in one post so I am grateful you brought these up. And thank you for that link to your review of Last Will, too. Not only do I not mind; I’m grateful. Your comments made my post better.
Omigosh. I have to add Intuition, C.J. box books and Total Eclipse. I liked Smilla’s Sense of Snow for 3/4 of the book; then it skyrocketed into a weird/high-techno, espionage sort of thriller.
I’ll put the others on the list and hope to get to them by 2020 when my TBR list will reach out to another galaxy.
Yes to science and what I like about some of the suggested books is that there women scientists!
And wonder if we can get the Paralympics over here.
And on the Nero Wolfe/Archie Goodwin series: Once one gets used to Timothy Hutton and Murray Chaykin playing the two sparring partner detectives, the series takes off, with lots of “Phooey” and “Flummery” comments. In one episode, Wolfe is mad at the police for sealing off his office as it was a murder scene and he’s having Fritz bring a gourmet lunch to everyone, but he yells, “But not for the police.” When he sees Inspector Kramer eating a ham sandwich, he intimidates him into putting it down. So funny. But I think to really enjoy it, one has to know the characters and their roles and idiosyncracies.
Kathy – Oh, I know so very well what you mean by a already-too-long TBR list *sigh* That’s one reason I like my Kindle Fire; I can remain in deep denial about how very many books I actually have that I need to read…. And I agree about seeing some women scientists “taking the stage.” And what’s most appealing is that the books I mentioned aren’t really self-consciously feminist. The characters are scientists who happen to be feminine.
Thanks too for your comments about the Nero Wolfe series. I got a good chuckle out of the scenes you shared. I agree though that it’s probably best enjoyed when one knows the characters. Now I will definitely have to look into seeing that series.
Margot: Thanks for an excellent post. I do not tell you often enough how much I enjoy them.
I had not thought of Smilla and science until reading Maxine’s post. When the book was talking about snow it was on solid scientific ground. Later in the book was science fiction.
Darkness at the Stroke of Noon by Dennis Murphy is a book set in the far far north of Canada in Nunuvut. Part of the book is a fictional journal of a member of the 19th Century Franklin expedition which ended in disaster for all on the expedition. It tells of a shift from exploration to trying to survive in the Arctic. Tragically the author died just as the book was being published.
Bill – That’s so very kind of you – thank you *blush*
– And my posts are made better by your comments. As to Miss Smilla’s…, I think you’ve expressed the division if you will in that book quite well. The information about glaciers, snow and freezing water is solidly based on science. The rest… less so.
And thanks for suggesting Darkness at the Stroke of Noon. It is sad that Murphy died when he did, before he could really enjoy the success of Darkness…. He is missed.
What a great post Margot. It reminded me of THE IMMORTALISTS by Kyle Mills. In it microbiologist Richard Draman is trying to find a cure for a genetic defect that is causing his 8-year-old daughter to age at an accelerate rate. This leads him on an intriguing adventure.
Mason
Thoughts in Progress
Mason – I’m glad you enjoyed the post. And thanks for the suggestion of The Immortalists. That storyline sounds really interesting and it’s got such an interesting focus on biological science. Now you’ve intrigued me!
It’s good to see you highlighting science like this – such an underrated subject in today’s world. I found it sad that the only way I could watch the recent landing of the Curiosity on Mars was via live streaming on the internet – none of our tv networks here thought it worth showing apparently. Yet most of them find many hours in their schedules each day for some version of reality nonsense involving young people drinking themselves into situations that should be embarrassing. Surely I can’t be the only person left who’d rather watch landing a machine on Mars than drunks leering at each other.
Thanks for the shout out too – I can’t think of any additional science-y crime fiction but I do think I need to go and find a couple of these
Bernadette – Oh, it’s my pleasure to mention your blog
– And I agree that not nearly enough public attention is paid to science. None of our local networks covered the Mars landing either other than a few interviews and some other little bits here and there. Watching it via live streaming was the only option around here too. Such a sad change from when millions of people watched the Apollo 11 moon landing. I can tell you too that you’re not the only one who’d rather have watched the Curiosity landing than reality TV. But then, please don’t ask me to justify a lot of what’s available to watch on TV..
I clearly don’t read much crime fiction with science in it as I haven’t read a single book on either your or Bernadette’s blog except the Agatha Christie one. As long as you include an AC book in your post, at least there will be one book that I have read.
Sarah – LOL! I know what you mean about Agatha Christie’s work. I always love it when there’s a reference to her books because I feel as though I’m on familiar ground.
I love science and mathematics and when they are in novels to give more accuracy, it’s even better. I love your examples.
Clarissa – Thank you
– I’m glad you enjoyed the examples. I’m also glad you brought up mathematics because it too is an under-rated body of knowledge. That’s one thing I like about work like your own The Sholes Key; it highlights the value of thinking logically and mathematically.
I’m halfway through my second Randy Wayne White novel. His stories are set in southern Florida, mostly around the Sanibel Island area, and painlessly educate the reader about the fragile ecology in that part of our country. Intriguing mystery plot as well. You can’t lose.
Barbara – Thank you for that suggestion! That part of Florida is ripe for a series that features ecological themes and it’s good to know that White treats those themes without bashing the reader over the head.