The other day (and no, this is not going to be one of my made-up stories; this really happened), I got a rude shock. Someone I knew (‘though not very well) was arrested. This person isn’t a friend or family member and hadn’t committed a crime against me or anyone in my family. So in that sense I didn’t feel betrayal or devastation. But still, seeing someone I’d known being led away in handcuffs was unsettling. It shouldn’t have been, I suppose. The truth is anyone can commit a crime. In Agatha Christie’s Hickory Dickory Dock (AKA Hickory Dickory Death) Hercule Poirot investigates the murder of Celia Austin. Just about everyone in the student hostel where she lives turns out to be a suspect and at one point in the novel Poirot is discussing the various motives with Inspector Sharpe, who’s officially investigating the case. Sharpe is astounded by the number of suspects and says,
‘‘For heaven’s sake, Poirot. You are making my head spin! Is nobody incapable of murder?’
‘I have often wondered,” said Hercule Poirot.’’
And yet, we are still sometimes badly shocked (yes, even crime fiction fans who you’d think wouldn’t be) when someone we’ve known turns out to be a criminal. As someone said to me about the arrest I witnessed, ‘You think you know someone…’ We build mental images of people we know, and most of the time those images do not include ‘this person has committed a crime.’
Crime fiction authors make use of people’s habit of building mental pictures. In the ‘whodunit’ kind of mystery, one way in which the author challenges the reader is by making the criminal turn out to be someone it would be hard to picture as a criminal. Of course there is a risk to this sort of plot point. A killer who’s too far out of the realm of possibility can stretch the story’s credibility too far. But if it’s done well, a killer who ‘doesn’t seem like a criminal’ can give a story an interesting twist.
For instance, in Agatha Christie’s After the Funeral (AKA Funerals Are Fatal), the Abernethie family gathers when patriarch Richard Abernethie suddenly dies. During that gathering Abernethie’s younger sister Cora Lansquenet says he was murdered. At first no-one believes her; Cora herself asks everyone to forget that she said anything. But privately everyone begins to wonder whether Cora might have been right. And when she herself is brutally murdered the next day, it seems clear that she was. Family attorney Mr. Entwhistle asks Hercule Poirot to look into the case and Poirot agrees. He finds that each of Abernethie’s relations could have had a motive for murdering him – and Cora. In the end, everyone (except Poirot of course) is shocked to find out who the killer really is. And part of the reason for that shock is that they couldn’t imagine that person being a criminal.
In Isaac Asimov’s The Caves of Steel, New York City homicide detective Elijah ‘Lije’ Baley gets a very difficult case. In the futuristic New York where he lives there are two main groups of people. The Earthmen are descendents of people who’ve always lived on Earth and built a world for themselves. The Spacers are also human, but they are descendents of those who explored space. The two groups have very different lives and perspectives, and relations between them are strained even at the best of times. Against this backdrop Baley is assigned to investigate the murder of noted Spacer Dr. Roj Nemennuh Sarton. Many Spacers suspect that an Earthman is responsible for the murder so Baley is asked to work with a Spacer partner R. Daneel Olivaw. The thing is that Olivaw is a positronic robot, and if there’s any group that Earthmen fear and hate more than they do Spacers it’s robots. So Baley and Olivaw have to break through several cultural and social barriers as they investigate. In the end, the killer turns out to be someone most people would not have guessed would commit murder.
That’s also true in Martha Grimes’ The Anodyne Necklace. In that novel, Inspector Richard Jury is called away from a planned holiday to investigate a murder. A finger bone has been discovered in the village of Littlebourne and when the rest of the body is also found, it’s clear that this was not a natural death. The victim turns out to be Cora Binns, who had worked for a London temporary services agency. She’d been on her way to an interview in Littlebourne but never made it. And this isn’t the only unsettling thing to happen in the village. One of the residents, sixteen-year-old Katie O’Brien, was brutally attacked in a London underground station. It turns out that these events are tied to a robbery a year or so before the events in the novel. And the person behind all of what happens is someone the village’s residents wouldn’t have guessed would be ‘the criminal type.’
Colin Dexter’s The Remorseful Day is the story of the murder of a nurse Yvonne Harrison. She had an unusual and complicated private life and a dysfunctional family. But when she is first killed the police can’t find any concrete evidence that implicates anyone. So the case goes ‘cold.’ Then two years later, the police receive an anonymous tip that Harry Repp, who’s just been released from prison on burglary charges, is guilty of Harrison’s murder. Inspector Morse and Sergeant Lewis are assigned to re-open the Harrison case and they begin asking questions. But Morse seems oddly reluctant to pursue the investigation. Then Lewis makes a discovery that suggests the shocking reason for Morse’s apparent apathy about the case. But this is after all Colin Dexter so things are not what they seem. When the real truth about Yvonne Harrison’s murder comes out, the killer turns out to be someone one wouldn’t have imagined as a criminal.
In Craig Johnson’s The Cold Dish, Sheriff Walt Longmire and his deputy Victoria ‘Vic’ Moretti investigate the murder of a local young man Cody Pritchard. Then a few days later, Pritchard’s friend Jacob Esper is murdered. Although there isn’t much evidence to go on, Longmire believes that he knows what’s behind these killings. A few years earlier, Pritchard, Esper and Esper’s brother George were convicted of gang-raping then-sixteen-year-old Melissa Little Bird. Longmire and his team suspect that one of Melissa’s friends or family members could be taking revenge. But this case is not quite as clear-cut as it seems. In the end, the killer turns out to be someone a lot of people wouldn’t have suspected of the murders.
You think you know someone…
*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Billy Joel’s The Stranger.













Great roundup as usual. I think After the Funeral is one of Christie’s cleverest plots, she totally takes the reader for a ride. Did you see the recent TV version? What did you think? The usual liberties and extras with the plot, but a fantastic performance by one of the actors (can’t really say which w/o giving too much away!).
Moira – Thank you
– And I agree about that particular Christie plot. It really is so very clever isn’t it? I did indeed see the TV version, and you’re quite right about that particular performance. I was impressed. I wasn’t really happy with some of the liberties though, to be frank. And there was a character in the novel whom I’d've liked to see in the production. But as you say, they do change things for TV and overall it was well done.
Margot: I agree The Cold Dish had an unexpected killer. Probably the most unexpected killer I never saw coming was in Jeffery Deaver’s opening Lincoln Rhymes book, The Bone Collector. I also liked the movie.
Bill – You’re right about The Bone Collector. I didn’t see that one coming either. I confess I haven’t seen the film, so I can’t comment intelligently on it but you’re not the first person to tell me it was good.
In a previous job it fell to me to liaise with Police for all sorts of things (one of the fun parts was helping them create fake IDs for their undercover work as I worked in the equivalent of your DMV). But much less fun was helping them when they wanted to access our computer network due to an investigation they were carrying out on someone employed at the organisation. Twice during my time there they investigated people for child pornography related offences and on both occasions their investigations uncovered evidence – in both cases I was utterly shocked as I knew both people and would never have guessed. The experience also gave me a teeny glimpse into how truly awful it must be to be a cop and to see the world in reverse to the way most of us do – i.e. unlike you or me being shocked at someone we know being accused of a crime they must be shocked when they come across someone genuinely innocent
Bernadette – That’s exactly the kind of feeling I had! I never would have imagined that that person would be guilty of a crime but apparently there was evidence that I was wrong. I really was shocked; in fact at first I wasn’t sure I saw what I thought I saw if you know what I mean. Interesting point you make too about the police’s view of the world. They must indeed get to the point where instead of being shocked that someone’s quite possibly guilty of a crime, they’re surprised at innocence. After what they have to see and deal with, I suppose it makes sense that they develop that perspective.
And I can see why it’d be fun to help the undercover cops make fake IDs; a taste of being ‘on the inside’ of an investigation.
Your story also reminds me of a time when a friend who worked as an engineer in London’s tube tunnels was arrested because he didn’t have his right ID with him. He was arrested under the ‘prevention of terrorism act’ which believe me you don’t want to get arrested under in this country. Fortunately it was all sorted out that day but he must have been terrified. I don’t think he’s forgotten his ID since.
Sarah – Oh, that must have been frightening for your friend! And just because he forgot his ID, not because he was doing anything suspicious. And I can well imagine one wouldn’t want to tangle with the Prevention of Terrorism Act – not at all like being stopped for speeding… I’m glad everything was sorted out for your friend, but still!
I was partly inspired to write my psychological thriller after some friends of mine were totally and utterly shocked when one of their close work colleagues was arrested and charged (and later convicted) for murder. They were so totally and utterly convinced of his innocence his company put up his bail money and one of them was a character witness for him. When he eventually pleaded guilty, their trust in their own character judgement was shaken to the core. That really fascinates me. People really can have a whole other side ot them…..
Allison – I can imagine your friends must have really been completely devastated. To have faith in a person like that only to find out that person was a murderer must have made them lose a lot of their sense of faith in themselves – and others. As you say, people can have a side to them or a life that we just don’t know about. You’re right too that as shocking and upsetting as it is in real life, it is fascinating as the inspiration for a story.
Great round-up, Margot. I’ve just read The Vanishing by Tim Krabbé – in that book, the identity of the murderer is revealed fairly early on but it does an amazing job of detailing the thought processes that lead an ‘ordinary’ man to commit murder. It really leaves you wondering whether anybody you pass in the street could be capable of such things.
Marie – Thank you
– And you make a really interesting point about the kind of novel where we ‘unwrap’ an ‘ordinary’ person (if there is such thing) to find out why s/he committed murder. Thanks for that suggestion. Books like that leave me wondering too whether people I see in shops or at the bank or something could be capable of serious crime.
Another great post and food for thought so to speak. You’re right in that we never truly know a person, we know only the elements they allow us to see. In a small town near me an investigator was recently arrested for stealing (and apparently using) confiscated drugs. Everyone he works with and the community is shocked. They all say it’s so unlike him.
Mason
Thoughts in Progress
Mason – Wow! That must have been a shock to all of you to find that someone you thought you knew wasn’t what he seemed. It’s awfully unsettling isn’t it? *Shudder* And thanks for the kind words.
What a brilliant post. Yes, so often you think you know a person well, and when it comes down to it, you find that you perhaps never really knew him/ her. Of course, I have never met a murderer yet, but….
And Cold Dish sounds like something I want on my TBR pile. Thanks for the lovely examples.
Natasha – Why, thank you
– You put that so well, too: you think you know someone and you come to discover that you never really did. I think it’s unsettling because it makes you mistrust your own judgement. Or at least that’s what happened to me. I hope you’ll like The Cold Dish. I think it’s a good ‘un.
This is so true. Just think of all the real life cases we’ve read about where friends and family had no idea what the guilty man or woman had been doing in secret, sometimes for years.
Pat – You put that very, very well. So often we hear on the news something like ‘I had no idea!…’ because people can’t imagine a given person committing a crime.
A good, kind, and generous friend was arrested on a charge of abusing her adult mentally challenged child. She was roughly handcuffed and neighbors saw uniformed police lead her out of her house. She was completely innocent and falsely accused. However because she was actually arrested, this is a permanent legal record which can not be removed. It’s good to remember that not everyone who is arrested is guilty.
Anna – What a tragic story! I am so sorry to hear that happened to your friend. It is an important and sobering reminder not to judge too quickly. And you are quite right; not everyone who is arrested is guilty. That’s why fair trials are so important.