The Alphabet in Crime Fiction: Kathleen O’Neal Gear and W. Michael Gear’s The Visitant

The Alphabet in Crime Fiction community meme is very close to the end of our tour! We’re already at our 22nd stop – the letter “V.” I’ve been really enjoying the chance to check out some new-to-me reading, visit other book bloggers and share what I read. Thanks, as ever, to our tour guide Kerrie at Mysteries in Paradise, who’s been keeping all of us together on our dangerous trip. My contribution for this week’s tour stop is Kathleen O’Neal Gear and W. Michael Gear’s The Visitant. Published in 1999, it’s the first of the three books in their Anasazi series.

The novel begins with a prologue in which Ash Girl, a 13th Century Anasazi woman, is frantically seeking help for her young son, who’s desperately ill. Instead of getting the help she needs, though, she has a terrifying encounter. Then, the action shifts to the modern era. William “Dusty” Stewart is an archaeologist who’s just received the clearance he needs to begin an excavation of the Chaco Canyon in New Mexico’s Sonoran Desert. Stewart is hoping to find out more about the Anasazi people who lived in the area centuries ago and is eager to begin his work. He and his team start the excavation under the supervision of Park Ranger Maggie “Magpie” Walking Hawk and her aunt Hail Walking Hawk. Hail is a member of the Pueblo Nation who’s been sent to ensure that the archeologists don’t desecrate sacred ground. Everyone gets settled into the routine of planning and beginning the dig. Then, they make a grim and unexpected discovery: the remains of eight women who seem to have been placed in a mass grave. Now the excavation has to stop until the deaths can be investigated – no easy task, since the bodies were found on sacred ground and the remains are ancient.

Halifax-based forensic anthropologist Dr. Maureen Cole is called in to help in the investigation. She’s worked with Stewart before and although she respects his knowledge of archaeology, the two do not see the world in the same way, and dislike each other. Still, she’s fascinated by the task and sets to work to find out what happened to these women. For its part, the archaeology team searches through the dig to find out more about the culture from which these women came.

At the same time as the modern-day investigation is going on, we also follow a parallel investigation. 13th-Century Anasazi War Chief Browser is carrying out the heartbreaking task of burying his young son. As he and his people are completing the ritual, they discover a body in the burial pit that had been intended for his son. And then there’s another attack. And more deaths. It looks very much as though some evil force is loose among the Anasazi, and Browser and his deputy and closest friend Catkin begin to search for answers. As this 13th Century team try to make sense of what’s happening, the modern day archaeology team work with Cole to try to find out the truth about the remains they’ve found. In the end, each team discovers the truth in its own way.

One of the important elements in this novel is the use of parallel timelines and perspectives and parallel investigations. The two stories alternate and tell of very different groups of people who are looking for answers. Even the writing style changes slightly depending on which story is being told. Those style changes are just one way in which the Gears ensure that the reader isn’t confused as to which story is being told at any given moment. The effect (at least for me) is that we look at the same murders from different perspectives. We also get a look at the murderer’s perspective; that perspective is given in italics so it, too, is easy to set apart. That said, though, readers who dislike multiple timelines and perspectives may find this aspect of the book a stumbling block. To be honest, I didn’t find it to be a problem.

Another element that ties this novel together is what we learn about archaeology, anthropology and the Anasazi people. The authors are both archaeologists and they put their scientific expertise and their backgrounds to effective use in this novel. That gives a real sense of authenticity to the story as we follow the modern dig team. The Gears also have a background in ancient history and anthropology, and that knowledge is obvious, too. We learn a great deal about Anasazi culture and lifestyle, and that adds to the 13th-Century-based plot line. There’s also a real flavour of the science involved in forensic anthropology and in archeology. What’s refreshing about this is that the scientific processes of looking for answers are portrayed realistically. Science is not always glamourous work; it’s painstaking and one doesn’t get the answers magically. That day-to-day aspect of science is shown honestly.

The major characters are also important elements in this novel. Stewart and Cole are both complex people. Each has been wounded by life, although in different ways, and it affects the way they interact with each other and with the world. As their backstories slowly unfold, we learn what’s happened to them and it adds to their depth. It’s also worth noting that their relationship is not a “typical” boy-meets-girl-they-hate-each-other-and-then-fall-in-love story. Stewart and Cole are attracted to each other, but mostly, they engage each other intellectually. They spar on many levels, but they depend on each other. Each brings some important skills and knowledge to the task at hand. As they work together and learn more about each other, they also end up finding some measure of personal healing. In the parallel, 13th Century story, the characters of Browser and Catkin are also well-drawn and interesting. Especially worth noting is that they’re not thinly-disguised versions of Stewart and Cole, only in ancient times. Instead, they’re unique characters. Browser is devastated by his personal losses, and has his own “baggage.” Yet, he isn’t a stereotypical “tormented sleuth.” For her part, Catkin is smart, skilled and extremely observant. She understands Browser possibly better than anyone else does, and yet again, their relationship is not stereotypical. They aren’t really lovers, but they are much more than friends.

There are also some interesting philosophical issues raised in this novel. One of them, for instance, is the uneasy relationship between scientific and philosophical/spiritual approaches to knowledge. Cole is a scientist and looks for scientific truths. Stewart is “tuned in” to the more spiritual/philosophical ways of viewing the world. Although each understands the other’s view, each feels the other is lacking. As the events in the story unfold, both approaches to looking at the world turn out to be important.

The story takes place in the Sonoran Desert of New Mexico, and the Gears place the reader unmistakeably there:


“Dusty gazed across the fire pit, between two tents, and down the length of canyon to the east. The cliffs wavered like golden phantoms. Not a single cloud adorned the pale blue sky, which meant there was no relief in sight. Without an afternoon thundershower, the heat would remain high well into the evening.”


The harshly beautiful country and the extreme temperatures add to the story as both groups of people search for the key to the mystery.

The mystery itself is almost less important than the rest of the novel. The deaths turn out to be the work of someone with an unusual kind of motive and the stories do focus on that mystery. But as much as telling a mystery story, the Gears tell the stories of the characters in both time frames and of the Anasazi culture. But what’s your view? Have you read The Visitant? If you have, what elements do you see in it?


Filed under Kathleen O'Neal Gear, The Visitant, W. Michael Gear

13 responses to “The Alphabet in Crime Fiction: Kathleen O’Neal Gear and W. Michael Gear’s The Visitant

  1. Sounds like an interesting and unusual book, Margot, thanks for highlighting it. I really enjoyed reading your post.

  2. Maxine – Thank you :-). It is both unusual and interesting. It’s got a lot of “meat” to it although it’s not a “doorstop” kind of book. Glad you enjoyed the review.

  3. Read? I had not even heard about this book yet. I agree with Maxine that it sounds extremely interesting with the old tribe and the modern archaeologists.

    But have we already got to V? It seems that it was a good idea of me never to join the meme officially as I have a couple of other things to think about this week. But I have been good today; I edited “The Cosy Knave” so that now the story fits the cover 😉

  4. Dorte – And your editing is very important! I can’t wait until The Cosy Knave comes out. I am excited for you :-).

    It is hard to believe how fast the weeks have gone by, isn’t it? Maybe it’s that I am getting older, but there seems to be a “fast forward” button on life these days. At any rate, I did find this a really interesting and unusual book. I like books in which I learn things, books in which the authors don’t follow all of the “cookie cutter” stereotypes and books in which the characters keep my attention. This has all three.

  5. I’d not heard about this series either! As I like the use of parallel timelines and perspectives and parallel investigations, this appeals to me.

  6. Margaret – The nice thing about this series, too, is that it’s a three-book series. So it’s not a great investment of one’s time to read it. And the Gears do an effective job of making sure that the reader isn’t confused about which time period and investigation is which.

  7. Enjoyed your feature on this book. These are two authors I enjoy reading, but haven’t read this book yet. I’ll have to add this to my TBR stack.

    Thoughts in Progress
    Freelance Editing By Mason

    • Mason – Thanks :-). I like these folks, too. They’ve done a few well-written series, haven’t they? I like it that their series are finite, so it’s not that hard to complete one of their sets of stories.

  8. Sounds fascinating Margot and the use of parallel timelines certainly sounds like it is very effectively deployed – completely new authors to me (as I am having to get used to saying …) – thanks very much.

  9. First of all, what a cover! It’s so beautiful. I’m sure it’s based on an old drawing. Next, I love parallel timelines. Especially ones that take us back to the past. I’m sorry that the Alphabet In Crime is ending because I’ve enjoyed looking at the picks.

  10. Sergio – I know what you mean about “meeting” new authors. There are so many talented writers whose work I don’t yet know… And actually you’re quite right; the parallel timelines and stories really are used quite effectively. I hope that if you take the chance to read this, that you’ll enjoy it.


    Clarissa – I’ve really enjoyed reading people’s choices for this meme, too. My TBR has grown *sigh*, but I have enjoyed it. And you know what? That cover was one of the things that first got my attention about this book. The parallel timelines actually work well in this novel, so I think you’d probably like the story’s structure, too. If you do read this, I’d love to know what you think.

  11. Patti Abbott

    This sounds fascinating-so difficult to pull off too.

  12. Patti – You’re quite right that it’s very hard to pull off the parallel timelines successfully. This story and the other two in the series do that rather well, though.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s