Just Another Reason For Another Lie*

AlibisWhere would the world of crime fiction be without the alibi? Alibis can range from the very specific forensic kind of detail (e.g. a person who was not physically tall enough to fire a gun from a specific angle) to the more nebulous (e.g. ‘I had no motive to kill him – hardly knew the guy’). Of course, not all modern crime fiction novels really feature alibis because they’re different sorts of crime novels. But a lot of crime fiction still puts an emphasis on sorting through alibis. I’m not a cop, but my guess is that checking alibis is probably one of the most time-consuming parts of any investigation. So it makes sense that they’d play a major role in crime fiction too.

Golden Age and classic detective fiction places quite a lot of emphasis on people’s alibis and very often, those alibis are what I’d call physical alibis. For instance, a person couldn’t have committed a crime because she or he was in a different place at the time of the murder. In Agatha Christie’s After the Funeral (AKA Funerals are Fatal), Hercule Poirot is persuaded to look into the death of wealthy entrepreneur Richard Abernethie. At first his death is put down to natural causes, but when his younger sister Cora Lansquenet says that he was murdered, everyone begins to wonder whether she was right. That seems even more likely when she herself is murdered the next day. The family lawyer Mr. Entwhistle does a little checking on his own to find out what everyone was doing on the day of Cora Lansquenet’s murder and in true Golden Age fashion, each suspect accounts for her or his time – and most of them aren’t telling the entire truth. In the end Poirot finds out the truth about both deaths and gets the various suspects to tell him what they were actually doing at the relevant times. Alibis feature in a lot of other Christie novels, too, of course.

One of the most interesting treatments of the alibi (at least in my opinion, so please feel free to differ with me if you do) is in Patricia Highsmith’s Strangers on a Train). In that novel, Guy Haines takes a cross-country train journey to visit his estranged wife Miriam. Also on the train is Charles Anthony Bruno, who has an insufferable father. The two fall into conversation, as fellow passengers sometimes do, and as the journey continues, each shares his unhappy personal life. Then Bruno suggests that each man should commit if you will the other man’s murder. That way, each man will have what Bruno thinks of as a watertight psychological alibi: no motive. Why would the police investigate a total stranger who has no motive?  At first Haines thinks that Bruno isn’t serious. But then, Bruno kills Miriam. He insists that Haines follow through with his side of the bargain and kill Bruno’s father. Haines refuses, but then Bruno makes it clear that he doesn’t have much choice. Haines finally reluctantly agrees and commits the murder. And that’s when the real trouble begins…  In this novel, we see how the concept of the alibi has broadened and evolved to include psychological alibis.

Modern novels still focus on alibis, both physical and psychological.  For instance, in Håkan Nesser’s The Unlucky Lottery (AKA Münster’s Case), Intendant Münster and his team investigate the stabbing death of Waldemar Leverkuhn. Leverkuhn is a seemingly inoffensive elderly man who went in with some friends on a lottery ticket. To everyone’s surprise, they win and go out to celebrate. By the time Leverkuhn’s wife Marie-Louise gets home a few hours later, he’s been brutally murdered in his bed. Once the crime is reported, the police start to investigate, beginning with Leverkuhn’s widow and with the other people who live in that apartment building. As the team talks to the various residents, we learn what each person’s alibi was. The team also talks to Leverkuhn’s children, who are grown and no longer live with their parents. They, too, give alibis that have to be checked. When it’s discovered that Leverkuhn and his friends won the lottery, those friends are also interviewed and their alibis checked. That process of getting and looking into alibis is an important part of this novel. As each alibi is discussed, we also get an increasingly clearer picture of the kind of person Leverkuhn was and that’s an important factor in the mystery too.

Amateur sleuths don’t have the force of law behind them, so it can be more of a challenge to find out what people’s alibis were. But even in those situations, alibis can play a very important role. For instance, Riley Adams (AKA Elizabeth Spann Craig) makes very effective use of alibis and alibi checking in her Memphis Barbecue series. In Hickory Smoked Homicide for instance, restaurant owner Lulu Taylor investigates the murder of Tristan Pembroke, an arrogant and malicious beauty pageant coach. Tristan is murdered during a large charity auction at her home, and because quite a few people attend the event, it’s not easy to tell who was exactly where when the murder was committed. Lulu wants to find the real killer because her daughter-in-law Sara is the prime suspect and she wants to clear Sara’s name. Lulu isn’t a cop, so she has to get people to give her their alibis in a less direct way. She uses a ‘chattier’ approach to find out where people say they were and it turns out to be effective. Bit by bit she finds out whose alibi is faked, and discovers who the killer is.

Lynda Wilcox’s Verity Long has to use her wits to learn and check alibis in Strictly Murder. She is the personal assistant to famous mystery novelist Kathleen Davenport; among other things her job is to find promising true crime stories so that Davenport can adapt them and use their essentials for her crime plots. In her personal life Long is looking for a new place, and as a potential home buyer she goes with a house agent one day to visit a candidate home. That’s when she discovers the body of television celebrity Jaynee Johnson. As the person who found the body, Long comes under her share of suspicion although she has no motive. So partly for that reason she decides to investigate. As the story evolves she has to talk to Johnson’s co-star, her producer, her agent and other people who might have wanted to kill Johnson. And from all of these people Long manages to get alibis. Slowly she puts the pieces of the puzzle together but not before the murderer finds out she’s investigating and targets her. In this novel, finding out where everyone was and how everyone really felt about the victim plays an important role in solving the mystery.

And that’s the thing about alibis. They can be faked or real, and they can be physical or psychological. They take all forms and the detective has to follow all of them up sometimes to find out who the killer is. But they have to be written with care. Plots that involve very complicated alibis can confuse or at least put off the reader. What about you? Do you pay a lot of attention to alibis when you read?  If you’re a crime writer, what’s your strategy for integrating everyone’s alibi?




*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Eric Clapton’s No Alibis.


Filed under Agatha Christie, Elzabeth Spann Craig, Håkan Nesser, Lynda Wilcox, Patricia Highsmith, Riley Adams

14 responses to “Just Another Reason For Another Lie*

  1. As you say, Margot, many Golden Age mysteries center around “unbreakable” alibis; authors like Freeman Wills Crofts used to come up with cases where a murder was possible only because of the train schedule on Tuesdays and Thursdays, for example. In one of Sayers’ Lord Peter Wimsey novels, the alibi is based on an incredibly complicated scheme of forging a train conductor’s punch mark on a ticket. But it is fun to try to match wits with the criminal and figure out the hole in a seemingly perfect alibi before the police do so. As a lover of “puzzle” mysteries, I enjoy that game of wits.

    • Les – Oh, I hadn’t thought of Crofts when I was preparing this posts, so I’m glad you added him. And I’m glad you mentioned that Lord Peter Wimsey mystery too; there’s another terrific example of the way alibis are set up and disproved. I like matching wits with the author too and trying to poke holes in alibis. It’s an especially engaging game of wits if everyone’s alibi seems to be strong.

  2. Margot: In the most famous murder trial in Saskatchewan of the last 50 years Colin Thatcher, a former Cabinet minister and son of a Premier, provided alibi evidence that he was not the killer of his wife. He did not help his case when he offered on cross-examination to take on the prosecutor outside the courtroom. While he was convicted we never knew whether the jury rejected the alibi evidence because the prosecution was allowed to present a dual theory to the jurt – either Thatcher committed the murder himself or hired someone to commit the murder. The case riveted the province.

    • Bill – What an absolutely fascinating case! And what a good example of how even providing alibi evidence isn’t enough to convince a jury one way or the other. If there’s an equally credible theory to the contrary I can see how someone on a jury might not be convinced that the defendant is innocent. I wonder too now whether the jury saw too many holes in Thatcher’s alibi or there was another reason they convicted. Really interesting case, and thanks for sharing it.

  3. kathy d.

    I enjoy the Nero Wolfe books where every suspect has an alibi in these classic mysteries — that is until the brilliant, stubborn and eccentric detective uncovers which alibi is phony. That, is after a great deal of detective work by his loyal assistant, Archie Goodwin, and often the aid of three other sleuths.
    With the evidence brought to him, Wolfe ponders it, as he interrogates all of the suspects in his office. Then, eureka! Something doesn’t make sense, doesn’t fit. Someone’s alibi has as many holes as a head of Swiss cheese. Then Wolfe moves in for the kill. The suspect can no longer deny his/her lie and confesses — or someone else in the room points the finger.

    • Kathy – I’ve always liked Wolfe’s way of being able to penetrate people’s alibis too. So many times every suspect seems to have a watertight alibi, but then one little detail turns up and that puts Wolfe on the right scent. I love that process, too. 🙂

  4. I scoff at all the people I know who have those apps on their phones like Foursquare that check you in to each place you go and virtually give a minute by minute account of each day – what if you ever need an alibi I say…which possibly demonstrates I’ve read too much crime fiction???

    I love the classic whodunnit that has to sort through each moment of the cast’s alibis and I think few do it better than M Poirot

    • Bernadette – Now you know why I don’t have Foursquare on my ‘phone! The more social people become online, the harder it is to cover yourself if you ever need to. Or maybe I’ve just read too much crime fiction myself…
      You’re right about those classic and classic-style whodunits. There’s an awful lot to recommend them and I love the way Poirot goes about finding and sorting through each alibi. And he did it before one could simply check everyone’s Facebook status.

  5. Wonderful piece and wonderful comments too. So fascinating to read and think through them all. Enjoying your blog so much and all the participants are so well informed about their authors and their books. Thanks so much.

    • Jane – How kind of you – thank you. I must say, I learn at least as much from people who are kind enough to read and comment than anyone ever could from what I write.

  6. AC’s ‘Lord Edgeware Dies’ has an interesting take on the alibi situation. I’m with you and Bernadette on Foursquare. When people rung my mobile and ask ‘where are you?’ I often think ‘mind your own business’. Why do you need to be accountable everywhere you ok?

    • Sarah – I couldn’t agree more. It’s not always anyone’s business where one is. That kind of inquisitiveness gets on my nerves, too. Nope – don’t think I want Foursquare… And you’re right: the whole issue of alibi is handled in a really innovative way in Lord Edgware Dies. It’s one of the things I really like about that book.

  7. Fascinating post, Ms. Kinberg. Everyone loves a good alibi, especially writers, who are constantly innovating and thinking up new ways of planting suspects as far away from the crime scene as possible. Often, suspects have alibis in spite of being right on the scene.

    • Prashant – Thanks for the kind words. And you’re quite right; developing a solid alibi is an important part of writing a suspect’s character. And some suspects do have alibis, even when they’re at the scene of the crime. That’s then the detective has to really do some spadework to find out who the real killer is.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s