That’s the Time You Get Me Runnin’ and You Know I’ll Be Around*

Enabling Have you ever known an enabler? You know the kind of person I mean; I’m sure you do. Parents who make excuses for their child’s mistakes instead of helping that child to be responsible are arguably enabling. So are people who cover for friends who are habitually late to work, or who drink too much. What’s interesting is that most enablers aren’t that way out of malice. Some aren’t even really aware that they’re enabling. I don’t have a background in psychology, but my guess is that a lot of enablers simply don’t want to accept that their friend or loved one has a problem. It’s a form of denial if you want to put it that way. Other enablers (especially parents and partners) see others’ problems as a reflection on themselves in a way (e.g. ‘If my child lies to a teacher, that means I’m a bad parent.’).  There are also people who enable because it benefits them in some way. For instance, authorities who look the other way when it comes to smuggling or human trafficking are enablers of that sort.

There are lots of enablers among crime-fictional characters, and that makes sense. A lot of the things that lead to crime are made a lot easier if one’s enabled in some way. Here are just a few examples to show you what I mean.

There are several examples of enablers in Agatha Christie’s novels, and discussing most of them would give away spoilers. But I can mention one in particular without giving away too much. In Death on the Nile, we meet Salome Otterbourne. She is a once-successful novelist whose work has faded in popularity. Rather than try to adapt to changing tastes, she continues to believe that her work is misunderstood and that it’s only a matter of time before it once again gets the acclaim it deserves. Still, the drop in sales has depressed her and she’s turned to drink. She and her daughter Rosalie take a cruise of the Nile, although to Rosalie,

 

‘One place is much like another.’

 

At first, all goes well enough. Everything changes though when fellow passenger Linnet Doyle is shot one night. Hercule Poirot is on the same cruise, and he and Colonel Race investigate. In the process, Poirot gets to know both Otterbournes, and he discovers how Mrs. Otterbourne’s drinking has been enabled.

In Donna Leon’s Fatal Remedies, university professor Paola Falier discovers that a Venice travel agency owned by powerful Paolo Mitri has been enabling the Thai child sex trade. The agency earns quite a lot of money from people who want to prey on children and are willing to pay well to do so. One morning, Paola is arrested for throwing stones through the window of the agency to call attention to their ‘side business.’ Matters are made complicated by the fact that her husband is Commissario Guido Brunetti of the Venice questura. Having his own wife arrested makes things quite difficult for Brunetti, and the fact that Mitri has strong connections to some very influential people just makes things worse. In fact, Brunetti ends up placed on administrative leave because of this situation. Paola isn’t proud of that, but she is equally determined not to allow the travel agency to continue to enable child predators.

C.J. Box’s Three Weeks to Say Goodbye tells the story of Jack and Melissa McGuane. He’s a Travel Development Specialist for the Denver Metro Convention and Visitors Bureau; she works at a local hotel. They are also the proud adoptive parents of a beautiful baby Angelina. All goes well until they discover to their shock that Angelina’s biological father, eighteen-year-old Garrett Moreland, never legally waived his parental rights. Now he’s come forward to exercise those rights, and he wants the McGuanes to relinquish custody of Angelina. As you can imagine, they refuse. Then Garrett and his powerful father Judge John Moreland pay the McGaunes a visit. During the visit, the McGuanes discover what a truly unpleasant person Garrett Moreland is. They also discover that his father is an enabler on many levels. Just to give one example, he makes it clear that if the McGuanes will do what his son wants, he will see that they get the funding and court approvals to adopt another child. In other words, it’s a thinly concealed offer to ‘buy back’ Angelina. This the McGuanes also refuse, and that’s when the real trouble begins…

And then there’s Malcolm Mackay’s The Necessary Death of Lewis Winter. In that novel, small-time gangster and drug dealer Lewis Winter has become a problem for some bigger players in Glasgow’s underworld. He wants to climb up the proverbial ladder to keep his girlfriend Zara Cope but instead, he’s been marked for death. Twenty-nine-year-old freelance hit man Calum MacLean has been hired to do the job. MacLean is a professional and does his job well, and part of the reason for that is that he’s got more than one enabler in his life. There’s his brother William, who has his concerns about Calum’s line of work, but still helps him out with transportation. There’s also the runner from whom MacLean gets the guns he and his accomplice George will use to do the job. This runner acquires and re-sells all sorts of guns, and can be trusted not to ask too many questions about his customers. The runner is very well aware of what the guns are used for, but enables the business because it benefits him. On the night of the planned hit, the two hit men go to Winter’s home to do the job, and the result has powerful consequences for everyone involved.

Herman Koch’s The Dinner focuses on two couples; Paul and Claire Lohman, and Paul’s older brother Serge and his wife Babette. One night the four of them meet for dinner at an excusive Amsterdam restaurant. As the dinner moves from course to course, so does the narrative. We learn about the backstories of these couples, about their family lives, and about a very dark secret they’ve been keeping. These are very dysfunctional people, and as the story unfolds, we see how that dysfunction has played out in disastrous ways. The more we learn about the real reason for the dinner, the more we see how enabling has played an important role in what’s happened.

Enabling takes on many forms, and it’s often (‘though of course, not always) counter-productive – sometimes outright destructive. There’s only been space here to mention a few instances from crime fiction. So, please, fill in the gaps I’ve left…

 

 
 

*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Steely Dan’s Dirty Work.

18 Comments

Filed under Agatha Christie, C.J. Box, Donna Leon, Herman Koch, Malcolm Mackay

18 responses to “That’s the Time You Get Me Runnin’ and You Know I’ll Be Around*

  1. Ah, now it’s not the criminals so much as the police who spring to mind! All these drunken or drug-addicted detectives who never get sacked, or the total mavericks who get away with outrageous behaviour. Carol O’Connell’s Mallory, for instance, or dare I mention Harry Hole?! Lucky for them that their superiors are enablers, or they’d all be unemployed…and no doubt would all become PIs! 😉

    • FictionFan – Now that’s a very well-taken point. There are certainly plenty of fictional cops who are enabled by superiors, despite doing things that would put a real-life cop out on the streets in a blink. You can say if you like that it’s because they’re brilliant cops. And some are. But some of the things they get away with really do stretch credibility far beyond the limits. But as you say, it’s a nice source for the new generation of PIs 😉

  2. I can well imagine how turning a blind eye to help out a friend can lead to bad results. Just can’t think of any examples. FictionFan has a good point about people in law enforcement who get away with bad or unprofessional behavior. A good topic, I look forward to more examples.

    • Tracy – I think FictionFan has a well-taken point too. There are so many examples of ‘maverick’ cops in fiction who do things that would get them in serious trouble in real life, if not fired outright. At some point I will have to do a post on that.

  3. Margot – I am a big C J Box fan but I couldn’t read the book quoted here- its great writing but the bullying/threats portrayed in the first few chapters felt so real I couldn’t continue.

    • Carol – In many ways, this is a chilling book. And it doesn’t get easier as the story moves on. That said though. like you, I like C.J. Box’s work very much, and this novel certainly bears the hallmark of his skilled writing and well-developed characters.

  4. This is to let you know that I have nominated you for the Very Inspiring Blogger Award
    — please see here for the details
    http://clothesinbooks.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/inspiring-blog-award.html
    And thank you for the inspiration….

  5. Margot, this is my first time here and wanted to say that I enjoyed your thoughtful post. Regarding parental enabling, I think that’s often driven by the mistaken idea that our job as parents is to make sure that our kids are always happy–rather than productive, strong, independent, generous, etc.

    • Anita – Thank you for the kind words and your visit. I’m so glad you enjoyed the post and I hope you’ll come by again. You’re quite right I think about parental enabling. Most parents love their children very much, so naturally we want them to be happy. But ‘happy’ is often confused with ‘in a good mood.’ The two are not the same. As you say, being strong, independent, generous, ethical, loving, productive, etc. equip a child for life in this world. Learning those things, though, doesn’t always put one in a good mood.

  6. Enablers enable for all the reasons you evoke, but there’s another reason that can’t be neglected. As long as the enabler is focused on “the other” person he/she does not have to look at their own shortcomings. It also becomes a form of control. It is common to see members of a family who don’t want the alcoholic/drug addict/or whatever to “get better” because then the focus will no longer be on that person but on the family’s dysfunction. In my work, I’ve seen this dynamic time and time again. I’ve even seen a mother smuggle drugs to her son who was in rehab.
    Interesting post, Margot, as always. 🙂

    • Carol – Thank you very much for your perspective on this! As an expert, your input’s really helpful. And I can certainly understand why enablers would have that sort of reason to behave the way they do. A mother who smuggles drugs in to her son in rehab doesn’t have to reflect on what sort of home that son comes from, if I can put it that way. That’s an important point and I’m glad you brought it up.

  7. Just to add something else. A child (though it could be an adult as well) who comes clean can become a threat to the enabler. As long as the attention is on the child or adult’s problem, a more serious problem might have to be faced: like sexual or physical abuse or some deep secret, such as murder…:)

  8. A fantastic post and I look forward to you doing one on the maverick detectives.

  9. Col

    Mackay’s book was one of my favourites of last year. Interesting to see how you draw common themes from what on the surface seems to be vastly different reads

    • Col – I remember that you really loved the Mackay. And the thing about crime fiction is, no matter how diverse the genre is, I think there really are some common themes and so on that run through it.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s