Speak Your Mind*

Political DissentEven the best-intentioned people don’t always agree on the choices their countries should make. There are a lot of issues, too, that don’t have easy solutions. That’s part of the reason for which there is political dissent. That dissent takes different forms, depending on the kind of government that’s in power, and the issue. But whatever form it takes, political dissent and debate can move a society forward when it’s productive.  That aspect of it is essential. And of course, political dissent can make for a very effective context for crime fiction; after all, there’s plenty of conflict and tension to be had in political debates and dissent.

In Ngaio Marsh’s The Nursing Home Murder, Sir Derek O’Callaghan has written an Anarchy Bill, specifically directed against leftist revolutionaries and their activities. It’s not a settled matter whether the Bill will be accepted, and it’s interesting to consider the question of whether such legislation squelches freedom of expression or keeps society safer. One day during a speech in the House, Sir Derek collapses due to a ruptured appendix and is rushed to a nearby nursing home run by his longtime physician Sir John Phillips. He survives the surgery, but dies later of what turns out to be an overdose of hyoscine. Chief Detective Inspector Roderick Alleyn and Inspector Fox investigate and soon determine that this death was not accidental. As they sift through the evidence and consider all the possibilities, they certainly can’t ignore the fact that the victim had written a controversial bill…

Agatha Christie’s short story The Kidnapped Prime Minister begins when Hercule Poirot gets a visit from the Leader of the House of Commons and a member of the War Cabinet. Prime Minister David MacAdam was on his way to Paris to make an important speech when he was apparently abducted. At this time, World War II is imminent, and there’s a real question as to what Britain’s stance out to be. You’ll know from your history that there was a debate between those who wanted to avoid war, even if it meant appeasement, and those who wanted to oppose Hitler, although it would mean war. MacAdam’s speech is crucial in this debate. He intends a ‘rally the troops’ speech in the hope of cementing support for his anti-Hitler stance. But plenty of his political opponents want to move the country in the other direction. Poirot and Captain Hastings get to work right away; in the end, they find out exactly what happened to MacAdam.

Sulari Gentill’s A Few Right Thinking Men is set against the backdrop of the Great Depression. Millions of people are out of work, and times are desperate. The question of what to do is not an easy one, and there’s a lot of debate. There’s also a lot of interest in political factions that promise solutions. Rowland ‘Rowly’ Sinclair and his brother Wilfred are members of a wealthy ‘blueblood’ New South Wales family, so they haven’t personally suffered as a result of the Depression. But they’re certainly aware of it. When their uncle is murdered, Rowly gets involved in the political dissent about what Australia’s future should be. He comes to suspect that an ultra-Right group called The New Guard might be responsible for his uncle’s death. This group, led by Colonel Eric Campbell, believes that Australia will do best with a government run by ‘right thinking men’ who maintain traditional ways of life and the current class order. Rowly infiltrates this group, hoping to find out who, exactly, committed the murder. This puts him in real danger from the Left (among which group he has friends), who will consider him a traitor if they find out he’s joined the New Guard. At the same time as he’s trying to find out who killed his uncle, Rowly also has to negotiate the various political factions who want to further their causes.

Gail Bowen’s Joanne Kilbourn Shreve is a political scientist and, before retiring, an academician. So she’s no stranger to political debate, and steps into the political fray more than once in the series. She’s frequently involved in Saskatchewan (and national) politics. In fact, in one story arc in this series, she becomes a panelist on a NationTV show called Canada Today. The show features debate on current issues, and includes commentators from across the political spectrum. It figures in a few novels in this series.

Alan Orloff’s Deadly Campaign has as its backdrop Edward Wong’s campaign for a seat in the U.S. Congress. His opponent in the upcoming election will be the incumbent, Sanford Korbell. One evening, a group of thugs disrupts a celebration event at a restaurant owned by one of Wong’s uncles, Thomas Lee. Rather than call in the police, Lee asks his friend Channing Hayes, co-owner of a nearby comedy club, to ask a few questions and find out if anyone local is responsible. When other members of Wong’s family find out about this, they warn Hayes to leave the matter alone. But Lee is determined to find out what happened, and Hayes feels he has little choice to go along. One distinct possibility is that Korbell arranged the attack at the celebration, so Hayes visits Korbell’s headquarters as a part of his search for the truth, and we learn a bit about his political positions as opposed to Wong’s. I can say without spoiling the story that the answer to what is right for Northern Virginia (which is where the novel takes place) isn’t the reason for the attack, or for the murders that take place later in the novel. But it does form an interesting thread of tension in the novel.

And then there’s Ian Rankin’s Saints of the Shadow Bible, which takes place during the debate leading up to the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence. Rebus fans will know that he’s not at all a political animal. In fact, in one funny scene, he turns off his car radio during a broadcast about the Yes/No debate, preferring to listen to a CD of the band Spooky Tooth. But the debate is woven throughout the story. In one plot thread, for instance, Justice Minister Patrick McCusky, ‘the face of the Yes movement,’ faces embarrassment as his son may have been responsible for a car crash from which he later fled. Matters get worse when the Justice Minister is found dead, apparently as the result of a housebreaking gone wrong. The ‘No’ campaign is facing its own problems. Prominent business leader and ‘No’ advocate Stefan Gilmour could very well have been involved in obstructing a murder investigation against Billy Saunders. That case is more than thirty years old, but it could still come back to haunt Gilmour. It will if internal affairs copper Malcolm Fox has his way. He wants to re-open that case, and he won’t lose any sleep if Rebus, who was a young constable at the time, gets caught in the net. The debate about independence certainly isn’t Rebus’ focus, but it forms a fascinating backdrop to the novel.

Political debate and dissent aren’t always pleasant. In fact, they can be polemical. But that clash of ideas can be the basis from which we move forward.

 

On Another Note…

I’d like to wish a Happy Canada Day to all Canadians. Erm – sorry if there’s extra noise from down here. We’re gearing up for a major election next year, and the rhetoric/polemic/name-calling/mudslinging debate has already started…

 

 
 

*NOTE: The title of this post is the title of a song by The Toasters.

18 Comments

Filed under Adrian Hyland, Agatha Christie, Alan Orloff, Gail Bowen, Ngaio Marsh, Sulari Gentill

18 responses to “Speak Your Mind*

  1. Oh. you’ve read the new Rankin – heard him talking about the Scottish Referendum and am dying to read it.

  2. Ha! Love the crossed out words at the end. Perfect, Margot.

  3. I was delighted you mentioned the Nursing Home Murder, as I’ve just read it – very much a book of its time, and with an interesting sideline on politics.

  4. Kathy D.

    Great topic. This is certainly a fact of life every day over here and in crime fiction it is often a theme. Can’t think of an author who delves into political ideas and differences as much as one of my favorites, Sara Paretsky. Her book “Breakdown” zeroes in on this topic, but so do many of her other books.
    And, speaking of, ahem, the coming elections here: There are 16 months to go and already the TV stations are filled with nothing but potential candidates. We’re already getting fed up. When do I get my favorite news commentary programs back from being hijacked by Satanic forces?
    So, I’ll bury myself in mysteries and chocolate and try to recover.
    But, 16 months? What a test of endurance?

    • It sure is an endurance race , Kathy. I’m already fed up and we’ve still got quite a long time to go still *sigh.*
       
      And you’re right that Paretsky tackles a lot of political issues in her books. And those debates are often woven tightly through the plots.

  5. Col

    I expect I’ll get to the Rankin one day, there’s a few earlier ones to read first though!

  6. Hi Margot — I’ve already stopped answering the phone for fear the political calls for our own 2016 elections have started. It’s going to be a very long and painful campaign season. I’d much rather read political thrillers….

  7. Keishon

    The inclusion of politics makes for a very interesting and captivating read for me. You’ve shared some great novels that I’ve yet to read but will soon run off and look up! The only author I can think of who includes a lot of politics in the background of his novels is Colin Cotterill and he does such a good job at it, too. The time period is perfect with socialist regime in Laos during the 1970’s. Most of the antagonists are high level officials in government. I love Cotterill’s sense of humor and how he pokes fun at their socialist policy. BTW, I need to catch up on Rankin as well. Great post.

    • Oh, I’m so glad you mentioned Cotterill’s work, Keishon! He really does a fine job, I think, of weaving politics into his novels without being tiresome. You’re right about the wit, too; it’s clever, effective and in just the right amount (well, for my taste anyway). And thanks for the kind words.

  8. As you say, Margaret, politics has (have?) been at the heart of many thrillers since the earliest days of such books. In 1905, for instance, the prolific and popular Edgar Wallace published his first thriller, The Four Just Men, which certainly marks the origin of the modern thriller novel. It is about a group of four men who – not to put too fine a point on it – carry out vigilante murders, killing criminals in the name of justice who cannot be touched by the law.

    Certainly in this first novel, the four men are working outside the law: they threaten the life of Britain’s Foreign Minister if he insists on pushing a particular law through Parliament that would force Britain to send certain exiles back to a sure death in their native lands. While the foreign minister is set up as a fairly sympathetic character, there is never any question in Wallace’s mind – or the reader’s – that the four just men are justified in their position and in their willingness to use violence to achieve their end. It’s a chilling book to read in this day of international terror.

    • I’m so glad, Les, that you reminded us of what a long marriage it’s been between political themes/issues and crime fiction As your example shows, there are so many issues in politics, and so many potential areas for conflict, that it’s a natural fit. Interesting too how that theme of international terror is not nearly as new as some people would envision.

  9. Thank you for including Rowland Sinclair and A Few Right Thinking Men in this list, Margot. It was always the political and social upheaval of the 30s that interested me particularly. Crime fiction, as you say, is a very effective vehicle for exploring dissent and discussing the issues that lead to conflict. I find historical themes inevitably repeat.

    • A true pleasure, Sulari. I really do enjoy the Rowly Sinclair novels. And you’re quite right about the way historical themes repeat. It makes me wonder sometimes how much we really learn… But that’s another topic. I think that the ’30s really did have some powerful upheavals on many levels, and people had so many different solutions to the problems. Some were genuine attempts to make things better. Some were power-grabbing. Some were cases of misdirected idealism. And some actually made sense. A fascinating time on that score.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s