In The Spotlight: C.J. Sansom’s Dissolution

>In The Spotlight: Val McDermid's The Grave TattooHello, All,

Welcome to another edition of In The Spotlight. Authors who write historical fiction strike a balance between providing the historical context and telling a story. That balance isn’t always easy to achieve, and every author has a different way of approaching it. Let’s take a look at one such approach today, and turn the spotlight on C.J. Sansom’s Dissolution, the first of his novels featuring Tudor-era lawyer Matthew Shardlake.

It’s 1537, and King Henry VIII is in power. He’s put into place a process called the Dissolution of the Monasteries, by which he intends to disband all Roman Catholic monasteries and convents and appropriate their income. Not only will this consolidate his power as supreme religious leader in Great Britain, but it will also add considerably to the royal coffers. A lot is riding on the success of this plan, not the least of which is Thomas Cromwell’s fortune. So when word comes that there’s been a murder at a monastery at Scarnsea, Cromwell wants it dealt with quickly and efficiently. That’s all the more important because the victim is Robin Singleton, whom Cromwell recently sent there to follow up on reports of vice and fraud.

Cromwell commissions attorney Matthew Shardlake to travel to Scarnsea, find the guilty party, and bring that person back promptly to London for trial and, presumably, execution. Shardlake, who is a Reformer like his patron, accepts the commission and goes to Scarnsea with his young assistant Mark Poen. Cromwell has, as you’ll no doubt know, a great deal of power, and refusing him is out of the question. Besides, success at this mission will be good for the careers of both Shardlake and Poen.

When Shardlake and Poen arrive at the monastery, they’re immediately greeted with suspicion, although they are made comfortable. The monks, their staff and their servants know that Shardlake is on commission from Cromwell, and that the fate of the monastery depends on their cooperation. Still, they do not trust their visitors, for obvious reasons.

Right from the start, there are several possibilities. One is that Singleton was killed by someone at the monastery, most likely to cover up fraud and abuses there (which he was going to bring to light). Another is that Singleton was killed by some ‘fanatic’ from outside the monastery. That’s not out of the question, as any deviation from the official Church of England belief system is regarded as heretical and grounds for gruesome execution. A third possibility is that someone from the town around the monastery is responsible for the murder.

Bit by bit, Shardlake and Poen start to trace Singleton’s last days and weeks. And it’s not long before they begin to get some clues. Then there’s another murder. And another. Before long, Shardlake sees that a great deal is going on at the monastery, and that there are things that several people want kept hidden. In the end, though, he gets to the truth about the murders and about what’s been going on at the monastery.

The novel takes place at a time of great change in Great Britain. There is, of course, religious upheaval, but the times are also politically quite uncertain. And it doesn’t make people any easier that relations with places such as France and Spain have soured. That feeling of uncertainty, uneasiness and anxiety is a very important element in the novel. No-one really trusts anyone. And everyone knows that one wrong word, either against King Henry or his church, can mean a death sentence or worse (and yes, people would no doubt argue that there are things worse than death).

There is also the element of the different beliefs about religion that were debated at the time. And there are no easy answers. Many people are dedicated to the Catholic Church. There are others who say that, while the Church certainly needs reform, it is a bulwark against a rising tide of anarchy. Still others are ardent Reformists, who want to see anything that smacks of Roman Catholicism destroyed.

Against this backdrop is the character of Matthew Shardlake. He is a Reformer, in the sense that he is very much aware of the abuses of the Catholic Church. At the same time, he also learns that those on the other side can be at least as abusive. Through his eyes, we see an evolving cynicism about religion, or at least an awareness that there are plenty of powerful people who use religious fervor as a cover for theft, fraud and glory-seeking. We also see that religion doesn’t always right the serious social wrongs of the day. Shardlake is neither stupid nor gullible. But that doesn’t mean he is without naiveté in some ways. And as his eyes are opened to what’s really going on, we see that the questions of religion that are wrenching the country are not as simple as some people want to believe.

Because the story takes place mostly at a monastery, readers get a look at life in a monastery in these troubling times. There’s the daily routine of prayer, work, communal meals, and so on. There’s also a look at the work that the various leaders of the monastery do. Readers also get the chance to see the role that monasteries played in the Tudor times. Sansom shows us that there is a complex and not-entirely amicable symbiosis between the monks and their staff, and those who live in the nearby village. And because this is historical crime fiction, readers also get a close look at what life was like outside the monastery in Tudor times. Daily life, social classes, and other realities of the Tudor era are woven through the novel. So is the violence of the times.

The solution to the mystery is complex and difficult, and Shardlake takes more than one ‘wrong turn’ as he discovers what really happened and why. That said, though, he learns the truth in a way that’s consistent with his background, the times, and the context. And I can say without spoiling the story that the solution isn’t really a ‘happy ending’ solution where finding out the truth makes everything all right.

Dissolution is a complex, layered look at what the religious upheavals of the Tudor years really meant for those caught up in them. It takes place in a monastery with a long history, and features a lawyer who’s trying to do the best he can to sort out what all of the changes in England will really mean, and what he really believes. But what’s your view? Have you read Dissolution? If you have, what elements do you see in it?

 

 
 

Coming Up On In The Spotlight

 

Monday 22 March/Tuesday 23 March – Shinju – Laura Joh Rowland

Monday 19 March/Tuesday 30 March – The Hot Rock – Donald Westlake

Monday 26 March/Tuesday 27 March – A Dark and Twisted Tide – Sharon Bolton

27 Comments

Filed under C.J. Sansom, Dissolution

27 responses to “In The Spotlight: C.J. Sansom’s Dissolution

  1. My Mum has just started reading these and is a huge fan already! Sadly she won’t lend me her kindle (can’t imagine why …) 🙂

  2. Col

    I’m probably not a massive fan of historical mysteries if I’m honest, though no doubt if I set aside some pre-conceived prejudices I’d probably enjoy it.

  3. lemon123

    I like to read about monasteries in the historical past. Would like this one. Really liked your review.

  4. I’ve had this on the TBR for quite some time after FictionFan wrote a review of a later one – it does sound so appealing especially as I love this time period in history – I must get around to it soon!

  5. I’m a huge fan of this series – was hooked by this one and feel each subsequent book has been better than the one before. The only problem is they’re so huge I never seem to find time to re-read them! And this is one series where I think the content does justify the length – they are so packed with everything – the way of life, religious upheaval, the politics of the time, as well as each one having a great plot. And never an anachronism or a bit that makes me feel the history is being distorted. Great stuff!

    • You know, FictionFan, it’s funny you’d mention the length of these books. Sansom does write long books, and usually, my inclination is not to read books that are quite that long. But as you say, there is a lot packed into each novel, and Sansom does a very effective job of weaving politics, religion, daily life, and so on in with the plot of each book. So the length doesn’t get in the way (or didn’t for me) in the way that it does in other novels. And Matthew Shardlake is a well-drawn character, in my opinion.

  6. I’m so glad I spotted this one in your “Coming Up” list a couple of weeks ago Margot because it prompted me to pluck it from my TBR shelves where i am ashamed to say it has been languishing since 2009! What a great story I had been missing out on all that time. You’ve highlighted all the best elements of what makes it an above-average book. I especially liked that even though in some ways the book’s events place it squarely in 1537 there are things that resonate today. In my town we are going through a massive change because the last of our car manufacturing plants is closing this year – there used to be several of these massive places – and if you are my age and ‘class’ either your father or your uncle or your brother or your neighbour worked at one of them – we have all been to their famous family days and so on – there was a news story about the last plant’s closure on the weekend – footage of the small part of the factory still operating and the rest of the machines quiet with only a few people left to dismantle them all – Sansom’s description of the monastery’s last days, especially the way it is pulled down at the end – seemed very apt to this current world.

    Maybe I should send you my TBR list and you can highlight all the books in future weeks/.months so I can be prompted to read them all 🙂

    • Reading your TBR list would be a great inspiration, Bernadette 🙂 – I’m really glad you enjoyed this novel as much as you did. Folks, do read Bernadette’s terrific review of Dissolution. You’re right about the way that Sansom depicts the monastery – as almost a shadow of its former self, with its heyday well in the past. And your description of the closing of that manufacturing plant is eerily similar to what happened in the town I lived in for a few years in the US Midwest. It was home to a large appliance manufacturing plant, and just about everyone was at least related to someone who worked there. Then the plant closed, and everything changed. It was that same sense of uneasiness about the future, and the end of past glories, if you will. And Sansom really does capture that well.

  7. I love this series and I suppose the main thing I love is the character of Shardlake – he is described as a ‘hunchback’ and once wanted to be a priest but was told that ‘no one with a visible affliction can be a priest’ and so turns to law. He is melancholic and his disability gives him an outsider’s eye on things. I particularly like the exchanges with the Moorish ex-monk turned doctor Guy Malton who treats him. Sansom is very good at balancing the history with the pace of the plot and characterization. I think the whole series is excellent.

    • I’m glad you like the series as much as you do, Vicky. And I couldn’t agree more that Shardlake is a rich, developed character. As you say, he’s got depths to him, and he has a different sort of perspective. And so does Guy Malton. It works well that they have an understanding of each other, and it gives Sansom the opportunity to show what sort of a person Shardlake is and way. It also allows us, as you say, to see the Tudor world through an ‘outsider’s’ eyes.

  8. I used to read historical novels in my teens, I don’t know why I stopped. I must revisit them think.

  9. Margot, I have always been fascinated by Tudor England though I have only ever read about that era in news articles. This book sounds very fascinating and I like the thought of reading about the life and times, “and other realities” of the Tudor period. A book like this must take the reader on a social and historical tour as well.

    • It really does, Prashant. Sansom has ‘done his homework’ in terms of evoking the time, place and culture, no doubt about that! If you do get the chance to read this one, I hope you’ll like it.

  10. I loved this book – I’ve enjoyed the whole series, but this one is still my favourite. I thought he did the atmosphere of the dying monastery sooooo well.

  11. tracybham

    It was Moira who first convinced me I would enjoy this series, and your piece and Bernadette’s review push me further in that direction. I do have a copy and I think only the length has been holding me back.

  12. I loved it too – and the other books in the series. Reading this has made me want to re-read them – now!

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s