It’s All Part of the Job*

NuisancesWe all have to deal with irritants in our jobs. They take time away from what we’d really like to be doing (or should be doing), and they can be time-consuming. Even when they’re not, they can certainly be frustrating. But they are part of the job, and as the saying goes, they come with the territory.

There are plenty of these irritants in crime fiction, and they can serve some useful purposes. They can add to character development, context, and sometimes, even the plot. Like anything else, they’re best used in moderation, so as not to distract from the plot. But when handled deftly, they can add to a story.

For instance, in Agatha Christie’s The Hollow (AKA Murder After Hours), we are introduced to Dr. John Christow, a successful Harley Street specialist. As the story begins, he’s finishing up his last bit of work for the week before taking a weekend trip to the country home of some friends, Sir Henry and Lady Lucy Angkatell. It’s not that he doesn’t want to help people who are genuinely ill, but he’s tired, a bit fed up, and eager to get on with the weekend:
 

‘It took him a quarter of an hour to deal with Mrs. Forrester. Once again it was easy money. Once again he listened, asked questions, reassured, sympathized, infused something of his own healing energy. Once more he wrote out a prescription for an expensive proprietary.’
 

His patient leaves, satisfied that all will be well. But she’s only been an irritant to Christow, who is eager to get away. I can say without spoiling the story that this particular annoying patient isn’t the reason for Christow’s murder two days later. But it does give a glimpse of his perspective on his patients.

Gail Bowen’s A Killing Spring features academician and political scientist Joanne Kilbourn. The main plot of the novel concerns the murder of a colleague, Reed Gallagher. Kilbourn gets involved in the investigation from the beginning, since she knows Gallagher’s widow. At the same time, she is concerned about a student, Kellee Savage, who is emotionally fragile to begin with, and who’s been making accusations against another student. Then, Kellee disappears. Kilbourn learns that she was last seen in a bar, and asks several of the students about what happened. It turns out Kellee made a recording of what was said there, and that one of Kilbourn’s students expressed some vehement opinions:
 

‘‘If I’d known Kilbourn was such a bitch about not letting people express their own opinions, I wouldn’t have taken her…course. You know what she gave me on my last paper? Fifty-eight percent! Just because I didn’t use secondary sources! I showed that paper to my boyfriend and a lot of other people. Everybody says I should’ve got an A.’’
 

Anyone who’s had a student like this will be familiar with the sort of trouble and annoyance such a person can create.

Kathryn Fox’s Anya Crichton is a New South Wales-based pathologist and forensic physician. When we first meet her in Malicious Intent, she works with her friend, DS Kate Farrer, to link a series of deaths. All of the victims turn out to have had traces of asbestos in their lungs; so, besides finding out the truth about the deaths, Crichton also sees the urgent need to track down the source of asbestos. In the meantime, she has to get on with the rest of her life. And part of what she does is give university lectures and work with students. Here’s a scene from one of her lectures:
 

‘Put the word ‘forensic’ in a lecture’s title and it pretty much guaranteed a full house. Anya introduced the day’s topic and a croaky voice from the back row interrupted.
‘Excuse me, but will this be in the exams?’
The most predictable question had taken all but thirty seconds to be asked.’
 

Again, anyone who’s ever worked with students will be familiar with this sort of person…

Police, of course, have their nuisances, too. There are plenty of people who will claim to see things they haven’t seen, or confess to crimes they didn’t commit, for any number of reasons. There are also those who take up police time with what most people would call trivial things that aren’t really the business of the police. There are other annoyances, too. Of course, the police have to follow up on these leads, because one of them could be valuable. And it’s not good for the police’s public image to be seen as ignoring citizens. It’s a difficult balance to strike.

We see a bit of this in Andrea Camilleri’s Wings of the Sphinx. The central plot of the novel concerns a young woman whose body is found near a landfill not far from Vigàta. It’s a complicated case, and Inspector Salvo Montalbano is trying to focus his energies on solving it. But in the meantime, he’s been assigned another case. Wealthy businessman Arturo Picarella has disappeared in what his wife, Ciccina, says was an abduction. At first, that’s what the case looked like, and Montalbano and his team took it seriously. But it turns out to have been quite different. The only problem is that Signora Picarella, who carries weight with the Commissioner, won’t let the matter rest, and creates a fair amount of annoyance for Montalbano.

Among other things they do to solve cases, the police often have to give press briefings. The members of the top brass use them for their own political purposes, and journalists use them to do their jobs. Sometimes those public updates and calls for information can be extremely useful. We all know stories of people who’ve contacted police with vital information after they saw a news story. And the police know that avoiding the press can create more problems than it solves. But for a lot of police investigators, dealing with press briefings is a real nuisance. Briefings take up their time, are often fraught with politics, and tend to result in a lot of extra ‘sightings of criminals’ and strong public sentiment. All of those can complicate police work. Still, they’re a necessary part of solving a major crime. We see this in a lot of crime fiction. I’m thinking, for instance, of several of Henning Mankell’s Kurt Wallander stories, and of Jørn Lier Horst’s William Wisting novels. In both series (and lots of others, too numerous to mention), there are plenty of scenes where the investigator has to make time for press briefings. Neither Wallander nor Wisting really likes them. But each knows it comes with the job.

And that’s the thing about those irritations. They’re part of the job, and they come with the proverbial territory. We may not like them, but they can add a layer of realism to a crime novel.

 

 
 

*NOTE: The title of this post is a line from Masketta Man’s Flying Good.

20 Comments

Filed under Agatha Christie, Andrea Camilleri, Gail Bowen, Henning Mankell, Jørn Lier Horst, Kathryn Fox

20 responses to “It’s All Part of the Job*

  1. Form filling and report writing has got to be one of the most detested tasks for police detectives. I remember R. D. Wingfield’s Frost and Colin Dexter’s Inspector Morse were both notoriously late with them.This must have been before the days of computers, though, so it probably did take quite a bit longer.

    • Oh, you’re absolutely right, Marina Sofia! Those two really do hate those forms and reports, don’t they? In fact, that’s a blog post topic in and of itself, so thanks for the inspiration…

      Of course reports and so on are easier to do now that we have computers. But I’d guess they’re not high on many cops’ lists of ‘Things I Like Best About My Job.’

  2. I always think of Frost and his weekly crime figures which he never had ready in time and often resorted to fiction to compile – even the most exciting jobs have grotty parts to them so another excellent theme to link some great sounding books to.

    • Thank you, Cleo. And you’re right; all jobs have those things about them that we really hate. Thanks for mentioning Frost and his creativity. I need to spotlight one of those books at some point.

  3. Sometimes it can be a colleague who causes the annoyance. Poor Pete Pascoe was always trying to find things to keep PC Hector occupied – something he couldn’t mess up. But that wasn’t an easy task…

    • Well, you’re right about that, FictionFan! Hector is a very effective irritant for Pascoe. And in a way, he reminds me of Catherine Aird’s Constable Crosby. A different sort, but also quite inept. And an effective irritant for his boss, Inspector Sloan.

  4. I drifted into contemplating how often I am the ‘irritant’, and how often I am antagonized by irritants, while reading this article.

    Aware that I am the exception, I still wonder: Could it be that you are sometimes a ‘too fast reader’ for some of your guests here? Your knowledge is extensive, and I can’t imagine the majority being able to read more than one book per week…

    Anyway, another well-done article on the most solid crime-fiction blog I ever found!

  5. These little annoyances do add the story and make it more realistic. Interesting post, Margot.

  6. Margot, thanks for another solid crime fiction theme. While I can’t add more examples, I do find sidekicks and hangers-on in detective and other fiction quite annoying. They add little to the narrative, especially when they don’t find favour with the protagonists.

    • Thanks for the kind words, Prashant. Sometimes those characters really can be annoying, can’t they? The best ones are well-drawn, so that they are interesting in their own right. But when they serve no purpose in the plot, they can be irritating.

  7. In Elly Griffiths’ books, Ruth Galloway is an academic, and she is hugely irritated by her head of department, Phil. He does little, talks jargon, is hungry for any publicity going, and is rather a grabber of undeserved credit. My sources say the type is common in academia, even outside crime novels. I’m sure you couldn’t possibly comment Margot, with your background!

    • What – me comment? Let’s just say, Moira, that I completely understand how Ruth feels about Phil. And thank you for mentioning that, too – it’s a terrific example of the kind of ongoing nuisance I had in mind with this post.

  8. In Katherine Howell’s Web of Deceit, Ella Marconi is finding her boss very irritating because he doesn’t see the importance of the lines of investigation she wants to pursue. On the other hand, I got irritated with Ella for going off on her own and investigating without backup.

    • I know what you mean, Tracy. Ella Marconi isn’t usually one of those stereotypical ‘maverick cops’ who don’t ever follow police or work well with others. But in that case, she does go off on her own. You’re right about her boss being annoying, too.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s