In The Spotlight: Larry Watson’s Montana 1948

>In The Spotlight: Ross Macdonald's The Far Side of the DollarHello, All,

Welcome to another edition of In The Spotlight. Sometimes, the experience of coming of age happens more or less peacefully. Other times, it’s traumatic. Either way, coming of age often leaves an indelible mark on a person. Let’s take a look at a dramatic coming of age today, and turn the spotlight on Larry Watson’s Montana 1948.

The real action of the story begins in the small town of Bentrock, the county seat of Mercer County, Montana. It’s 1948, and twelve-year-old David Hayden has what he thinks is a settled existence with his parents, Wesley and Gail.  Wesley Hayden is the sheriff of Mercer County; but as a rule, that doesn’t amount to much more than locking up drunks until they sober up. Life has a predictable routine, and the Hayden name is a respected one in the area.

Everything changes when the family’s housekeeper, Marie Little Soldier, falls ill with pneumonia. To everyone’s shock, she refuses to allow Wesley’s brother Frank, a well-known doctor, to treat her. At first, she won’t explain why, but finally she confesses. As it turns out, Frank Hayden has been raping some of his female patients from the local Fort Warren (Sioux) Indian Reservation. No-one has spoken out against him because the Hayden name is too powerful. Besides, who would believe the story? Marie admits that she, too, has been one of the doctor’s victims.

Then, Marie dies. At first it looks very much like a sudden relapse, although she’d been doing much better. But there are pieces of evidence that don’t add up. Why, for instance, was Frank near the house on the day she died? And what about the accusations of rape?

Now, Wesley Hayden is faced with a terrible choice. It’s very likely that his brother is a serial rapist. He could be a murderer, too, if he killed Marie to keep her quiet. So, on the one hand, Wesley has to do his job. On the other hand, this is his brother, who happens to be a decorated World War II veteran. What’s more, he is a highly respected doctor, and an accusation against him shouldn’t be made lightly. There’s also the fact that Wesley and Frank’s parents are very supportive of Frank.

Finally, Wesley comes up with a solution of sorts. To save his brother from the humiliation of imprisonment, he locks Frank up in his (Wesley’s) home. That way, he’ll be able to investigate the allegations against Frank. This doesn’t by any means resolve the issue, though, Now, the family is torn apart, and David has to cope with divided loyalties and ugly revelations about his family. As he looks back many years later, we see the impact of what happens as a result of the investigation.

While this isn’t, strictly speaking, billed as a crime story, it certainly has crime as its central focus. And in this case, the crime is against members of the Sioux community. So, one element in the novel is the relationship between the local whites and the Native Americans. Conscience drives Wesley Hayden to investigate, but the culture of the times is very much against him. There’s sometimes blatant racism as people react to what happened. There’s also the very understandable fact that few people at Fort Warren trust a white man (especially the brother of the accused) to get justice. Still, Wesley pursues the case.

Another element in this novel is the impact of the case on the Hayden family. On the surface, the family seemed like ‘the perfect American family.’ But underneath, there’s been denial of what Frank was doing and dysfunction in the way the two sons were treated (Frank’s a war hero; Wesley couldn’t serve because of health issues). So, when this investigation comes up, a very fragile family structure is severely threatened.

The story is told from David’s point of view, so we see the events from two perspectives, really. The young David is confused, torn between people he loves, and just beginning to be aware of his family’s standing in the community and of the realities of prejudice in the area. The adult David sees things, as you’d expect, from a more mature point of view. It doesn’t change what happened (and some of it is ugly), but he’s come to an understanding of his family members and of the events, and of his own helplessness to do much about anything at the time. Watson uses this strategy to reveal the truth about the family that lies just underneath the surface.

The story takes place in small-town Montana, just after World War II, and Watson offers a sense of life in that type of community at that time. People know one another, and depend on one another. This makes it especially difficult for Wesley Hayden. Everyone will know the Hayden family business, and there are people who feel strongly that the doctor’s reputation is a lot more important than the welfare of the local Sioux women.

This isn’t a long story (my edition clocked in at 197 pages). So, it focuses more on that one pivotal year than it does on a long family or local history. Still, Watson offers complex background on the Hayden family as well as on the town of Bentrock.

Montana 1948 tells the story of some terrible crimes, and of the impact they have on a family, and on a community. It also shows the effect of denial, and of the way it can be used to cover up some awful realities. It takes place in a distinct post-war, small-town atmosphere, and features a young boy who’s trying to make sense of it all. But what’s your view? Have you read Montana 1948? If you have, what elements do you see in it?

 
 
 

Coming Up On In The Spotlight

 

Monday 14 November/Tuesday, 15 November – The Eye of Jade – Diane Wei Liang

Monday, 21 November/Tuesday, 22 November – Rule 34 – Charles Stross

Monday, 28 November/Tuesday, 29 November – The Secret River – Kate Grenville

21 Comments

Filed under Larry Watson, Montana 1948

21 responses to “In The Spotlight: Larry Watson’s Montana 1948

  1. This sounds like a very unusual and powerful story, and the family tension surely adds to the overall effect. When was it written? I’m guessing not 1948, so it’s historical fiction in a sense?

    • The novel was published in 1993, Marina Sofia. So it’s historical in a sense. But it has ‘bookends’ that take place in contemporary times as the older David reflects. That said, though, the guts of the story take place in 1948. And yes, it is both unusual and powerful. It stayed with me after I read it, if I can put it that way.

  2. This sounds like a good story, Margot. I like to read about families and the secrets they keep.

  3. Col

    I thought I read this years ago, but reading your post isn’t bringing it back to me. I still have it in the tubs, maybe time to look or look again!

  4. Completely new to me but sounds great – Thanks Margot

  5. As you know, this is one of my favorite novels.

  6. This sounds fascinating, Margot! You were discussing small communities yesterday – this seems to be a perfect example of how that can be used to great effect. One for the wishlist, for sure!

    • You know, it’s funny, FictionFan. It must have been my subconscious working, because I hadn’t deliberately planned putting the two posts together. It did sort of work out that way on the surface. Must have been my brain trying to put things together. It is well, well worth the read, I think. It raises a lot of interesting questions and issues, and certainly gives a look at a small post-war US community.

  7. Terrific review of what sounds like an intriguing novel, Margot. Has Larry Watson written much else?

  8. This sounds like a very intriguing story, Margot. You’ve got me wondering how it turns out. From your spotlight, I can’t help but feel for Wesley being, as the old saying goes, between a rock and hard place when it comes to doing his job and sticking up for his brother. One thing you didn’t mention, what was the relationship like between the brothers before the incident happened?

    Thoughts in Progress
    MC Book Tours

    • Interesting question, Mason. The two brothers weren’t exactly close, close friends. But at the same time, there wasn’t specific animosity between them. What there was, was a lifetime of Frank being the preferred, if you will, of the two brothers. It makes for an interesting layer of tension. And Watson really does make you feel for Wesley’s impossible choice.

  9. I’ve not heard of this story but for a short one it sounds incredibly powerful and covers a lot of ground. Interesting that it isn’t billed as a crime novel but I suppose with the coming of age aspect and the family relationship angles there were lots of other points that maybe the publishers thought would appeal to the readers.

    • I thought that it was interesting it wasn’t billed as crime fiction, too, Cleo. A lot of people think of it as literary, and there’s definitely an argument for that. And, as you say, there were, I’m sure, publishing folks who thought that a focus on the family aspects, the coming-of-age aspect, and so on, would sell more books. It certainly packs a punch for short novel/novella. If you read it, I’ll be interested in what you think of it.

  10. I read this a good few years back, and yes, I remember it as a powerful book, hard to classify. Thanks for the reminder.

  11. Pingback: Writing Links in the 3s and 5…11/14/16 – Where Genres Collide

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s