In The Spotlight: Lawrence Sanders’ The Anderson Tapes

Hello, All

Welcome to another edition of In The Spotlight. Narrative voice is an important part of any story, and often gives that story much of its tone. The voice might be first or third person, and it might include one or more than one point of view. Not all stories are told this way, though. As an example, let’s turn today’s spotlight on Lawrence Sanders’ debut novel, The Anderson Tapes, which is told entirely through the means of transcripts, letters, notes, and other written anecdotes.

Professional thief John ‘Duke’ Anderson has recently been released from New York’s Sing Sing Prison. He’s got a legal job working in a printing plant, but everything changes when he meets wealthy Agnes Everleigh, who lives in an exclusive Manhattan apartment building. After seeing the building and getting a sense of the wealth of its residents, Anderson decides to pull off a major heist. His plan is to rob every apartment in the building. The way he sees it, the haul could be worth a major fortune.

Anderson knows he can’t do the job alone. So, little by little, he gets in touch with various contacts he has to get the help he’ll need (e.g. money to finance the operation, a getaway truck for the loot, some ‘muscle,’ someone to deal with locks and alarms, and so on). Beginning in April, 1968 (the book was published in 1970), Anderson and his team put their scheme together. It’s decided that the best time to rob the building will be during a holiday weekend, when most people are out of town. The goal is to get as much loot as possible without, ideally, hurting anyone, much less killing anyone. The US holiday of Labor Day (early September) is selected, and the plans are made.

The building is carefully observed, and the identities and habits of the residents are noted. As time goes on, Anderson and his team make adjustments, but the basic plan seems to hold water. And on the night chosen, everything is in place, and everyone knows exactly what to do. But they also know that anything might happen, and plans can change at the last second.

Most of Anderson’s contacts are involved in some way in the underworld. Some are in the Mafia; others are simply people with criminal pasts. One is under PI surveillance because of a pending divorce. Almost all of them are under investigation for one other another reason. Because of that, the FBI and several other law enforcement agencies have been wiretapping and otherwise eavesdropping on most of the people involved in the plot. And neither Anderson nor anyone else involved in the plot is aware of being recorded. As the day of the planned robbery gets closer, the question is: will the team get to pull off the heist before anyone in law enforcement is able to stop them?

The story is told documentary-style, in the form of transcripts, letters, newspaper articles, interviews, and so on. Each chapter begins with notes about who the characters discussed in the chapter are and why they (or the locations) are under surveillance or being interviewed. Readers who prefer one point of view (either first or third person) will notice this. That said, though, the story is told in a roughly chronological way. For example, first, Anderson visits the building; then, he meets with some of his underworld contacts to discuss his idea; then, he gets the financial backing he’ll need. The documentation reports the plans in different ways and from different points of view.

The novel has been called a thriller, and there are elements of the thriller in it. The story is fast-paced, and there’s mounting tension as the heist is planned. Will every detail fall into place? Can everyone be trusted to do the job? Is Anderson taking too many risks by working with the Mob? Have they planned for contingencies?

Despite the pace, the novel also discusses some larger questions. For example, several different branches of law enforcement are involved in the various wiretapping and other surveillance operations. Why aren’t they exchanging information and coordinating their efforts? There’s also some discussion of what makes a criminal, and of why people break the law. There’s also a discussion of the code some criminals have. They’ll rob and steal, but most of them don’t want to kill.

This isn’t a light story, in the way that a comic-caper novel is. There is violence, and not all of it is ‘off stage.’ There’s also quite a lot of very explicit language. It should also be noted that the language reflects some ugly prejudices; there are several unpleasant ‘isms’ in some of the characters’ attitudes.

The story’s focus is a posh East Side apartment building, so readers get to know something about the people who live there. Besides Agnes Everleigh, there’s a wealthy psychiatrist, an elderly widow and her companion/housekeeper, a management consultant and his family, and a successful interior decorator. They’re all different, and each adds an interesting perspective to the events in the story.

For fans of Sanders’ Deadly Sin series, it’s worth mentioning that Captain Edward X. Delaney, who features in that series, makes his debut here. He doesn’t appear until later in the novel, but we get a first glimpse of him and his view of police operations here.

The Anderson Tapes tells the story of the meticulous planning that goes into a major criminal operation. It depicts all of the different people who are involved and shows how one person’s audacious idea links them. It also depicts the lives of some of the well-to-do who live in just the sort of upmarket building that appeals to a bold professional thief. And it’s told in an unusual way, with a different sort of narrative voice. But what’s your view? Have you read The Anderson Tapes? If you have, what elements do you see in it?

ps. Cinema fans will know that this novel is the basis for Sidney Lumet’s 1971 film of the same name.


Coming Up On In The Spotlight

Monday, 19 February/Tuesday, 20 February – The Wheel Spins – Ethel Lina White

Monday, 26 February/Tuesday, 27 February – Deal Breaker – Harlan Coben

Monday, 5 March/Tuesday, 6 March – Innocence; or, Murder on Steep Street  – Heda Margolius Kovály


Filed under The Anderson Tapes

16 responses to “In The Spotlight: Lawrence Sanders’ The Anderson Tapes

  1. What a cracking way to tell a story and yet another one I haven’t come across before. I like the idea of the premise although burglary isn’t normally my crime of choice (in the fictional world only of course!) but when carefully planned for a big haul as in this story, I should imagine there is lots of material. As for the isms, well they were more openly voiced then than they probably are now?

    • I thought there was a lot of material, too, Cleo, as far as the planning went. And Sanders doesn’t describe those preparations in a ‘list’ sort of a way. There are secret meetings, tense conversations, and so on. You’re right, too, that Sanders chose an innovative and attention-getting way to tell a story. If I’m being honest, it takes a chapter or two to get accustomed to it, because we’re all so used to more conventional narrative style. But it is really innovative. You make a good point about the ‘isms,’ too. They are blatant and openly voiced, and perhaps that reflects the era. From today’s perspective, they are ugly and offensive. But it’s sometimes hard to assess these things through ‘hindsight vision.’

  2. Howard

    I think Sanders was a pretty great writer, and he’s little discussed these days. The Deadly Sin series, the Commandment series, the Timothy books, and the Archy McNally books are all worthy, though quite varied in their noir levels. He also wrote one work I consider science fiction: The Tomorrow File. I liked that one too.

    I wasn’t as enthusiastic about the Tangent books.

    • You make an interesting point, Howard, that Sanders doesn’t get the attention he used to get. And he did write several series (thanks for mentioning them). I admit I’ve not read the Tangent books. But his others reflect an interesting variety, and he was prolific and innovative.

  3. Keishon

    Can’t say I’ve read him but I have heard of him.

    Can’t wait to see what you have to say about Harlan Coben’s Deal Breaker. I remember reading the first three chapters and then I set it aside. It looked like it would be a series for me to enjoy with the humor and such but….I’ve been wrong a million times so this time won’t be any different.

    • It’s hard to say, Keishon. The fact is, no book, no author, no series is for everyone. So, perhaps your first impression of Coben’s work was accurate for your taste and interest. As for Sanders, if you do try his work, I hope you’ll like it.

  4. Col

    I have this one on the pile somewhere Margot and I’m looking forward to it more than ever now. It does seem and interesting way of telling a story.

  5. This is definitely going on my TBR list. It sounds fascinating. Thanks for the introduction, Margot.

  6. Spade & Dagger

    Thanks: New to me author & plot style – so will have to give it a go.

  7. Yep. It’s going on my TBR list. Thanks, Margot!

  8. I remember seeing the film a long time ago, but really can’t recall whether I’ve read the book. Definitely read some by Sanders. Anyway, definitely sounds worth digging out! Thanks Margot, great post.

    • Glad you liked the post, Moira. Sanders takes an unusual approach to storytelling in this one, and I give him credit for not following the ‘usual’ recipe. And he did write some solid thrillers.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s