In The Spotlight: Paul Levine’s Solomon vs Lord

Hello, All,

Welcome to another edition of In The Spotlight. Legal cases are as varied as the people involved in them. So are crime novels that feature lawyers. And there aren’t too lawyers much more different than Paul Levine’s Miami-based Steve Solomon and Victoria Lord. Let’s take a look at how different lawyers go about their work, and turn today’s spotlight on Solomon v Lord, the first of Levine’s Solomon and Lord series.

As the story begins, Solomon and Lord are in holding cells on charges of contempt of court. They’re on opposite sides of a case (Lord’s prosecuting, Solomon’s defending), and have made the mistake of annoying the judge with their arguing and bickering. When they’re finally released, they finish their arguments and the case is decided.

They dislike each other right away. To Solomon, Lord is far too ‘by the book.’ She’s rigid, narrow, and has no sense at all of humour. To Lord, Solomon is not much above a sleazy ambulance-chaser. He flouts the law and engages in courtroom antics to get his point across. They come from very different backgrounds, too. Solomon doesn’t have a lot of money, he didn’t go to an Ivy League law school, and so on. Lord, on the other hand, has ‘blueblood’ lineage and went to Yale Law School. In fact, she’s engaged to marry wealthy Bruce Bixby and work for his land development firm – corporate rather than trial law.

But these two lawyers soon end up working on the same side. Wealthy Charles Barksdale has died in what could be an accident but might not be. It seems he was involved in some very kinky sex when he suddenly died of asphyxiation. His much-younger wife, Katrina, is suspected of killing him, and in fact, is arrested. Solomon feels that if he can get that case and defend Katrina Barksdale, he can make his name (and get quite a good fee). For that, though, he needs connections, since the Barksdales move in very high circles. It turns out that Lord belongs to the same country club as Katrina Barksdale, so Solomon finds a creative way to wangle an introduction and the case. The proviso is that Solomon and Lord will work together.

In the meantime, Solomon has another, major problem. He’s been raising his eleven-year-old nephew, Bobby, since rescuing the boy from an abusive situation. What makes it all worse is that the abusive parent is Solomon’s sister, Janice. What’s more, Bobby has special needs, and suffered real trauma. So, it’s taken a long time for the two to trust each other. Now, Jack Zinkavich of the Division of Family Services is threatening to do what is necessary to make Bobby a ward of the state and put him in an institution. This, Solomon knows, would harm the boy. Besides, he loves Bobby and wants to take care of him.

Solomon hopes that if he wins the Barksdale case, he’ll be in a better position to be named as Bobby’s guardian. And, without spoiling the story, I can say that the two cases are tied together in another way, too. So, with so much at stake, Solomon and Lord work together to defend Katrina Barksdale and to ensure that Bobby will have a permanent home with his uncle.

This is in many ways a legal novel. So, readers follow along as Solomon and Lord plot strategy, work through the various steps of preparing for a trial, and so on. There are judges, courthouse meetings, meetings with their client and witnesses, and so on.

The novel is also the story of very different legal styles. Solomon has a strong sense of people (he sometimes calls himself the human polygraph). He doesn’t do a lot of preparation, and sometimes stretches the law. For him, the law is less important than the human beings involved in a given situation. He’s smart, shrewd, and is willing to try all sorts of unorthodox things if they’ll help his case. Lord, on the other hand, does a lot of legal research, makes copious notes, and prepares at length. She’s also one of the best rookie lawyers there is. Together, they make a formidable team, despite their differences.

The story takes place in the Miami/Dade County area of Florida, and that’s very clear. In terms of daily life, culture, weather, and more, this is a distinctly ‘Florida’ story. And it’s interesting to see the way the setting impacts the case and the story.

Another important element in the story is the set of characters. Some of the characters are eccentric, even a little strange. All of them are more than they seem on the surface. The story is told from both Solomon’s and Lord’s perspectives (third person, past tense). So we especially get to know their characters. Solomon can be immature, short-tempered, and even conceited. But he’s courageous, utterly devoted to Bobby, and determined that those who most need it get justice. Lord can be aloof, even seeming cold. She hasn’t learned to use her gut instincts, and she’s much more fixed on the letter than on the spirit of the law. But she’s brave, sharp-witted, and resilient. And she has more of a compassionate side than most people think.

It’s also worth noting that the novel features a set of ‘Solomon’s Laws,’ rules by which Solomon lives. They also give insight into his character. Two of them, for instance, are:

When the Law Doesn’t Work…Work the Law.

I Will never Compromise My Ideals to Achieve Someone Else’s Definition of Success.

The story has plenty of wit, as Solomon is good at wisecracks. There are also some funny scenes. But it’s not a light, ‘happy’ sort of a story. And it’s not all a cosy novel. There’s plenty of foul language, references to sex, and some violence (although the violence isn’t really brutal).

Solomon vs Lord introduces two very different, but equally skilled, lawyers. It takes place in a distinctly Florida setting, and features two cases that aren’t what they seem on the surface. Oh, and for those who might be interested (by whom I especially mean Moira at Clothes in Books), there’s a lot of interesting detail about clothes. But what’s your view? Have you read Solomon vs Lord? If you have, what elements do you see in it?


Coming Up On In The Spotlight

Monday, 19 March/Tuesday, 20 March – Birth Marks – Sarah Dunant

Monday, 26 March/Tuesday, 27 March –  Koreatown Blues – Mark Rogers

Monday, 2 April/Tuesday, 3 April – The Salaryman’s Wife – Sujata Massey


Filed under Paul Levine, Solomon vs Lord

20 responses to “In The Spotlight: Paul Levine’s Solomon vs Lord

  1. Hmm… I’m on the fence about his one. On the one hand I do like books about lawyers and trials, but on the other hand the foul language aspect puts me off, as does the personal involvement element of the nephew. I think I shall resist your blandishments this week… 😉

    • Curses! Foiled again! 😉 – The truth is, FictionFan, no book or series is for everyone. And, after all, our TBR lists are too long, and life too short, to spend time on books that don’t appeal.

  2. Margot: I have read Solomon v. Lord and three subsequent books in the series. I consider Solomon v. Lord the funniest legal mystery I have read. Between Solomon and Lord I am much more like Victoria Lord. Solomon’s second law – In law and in life, sometimes you have to wing it – is clever but too frightening for me to attempt in real life. Inspiration may not strike you in the courtroom. I found Bobby intriguing rather than distracting.

    • I agree, Bill, that there are some very funny scenes in Solomon vs Lord. For instance, folks, there’s a memorable scene with a parrot in the courtroom. I know what you mean, too, about being a planner. I’m the same way. Winging it is a risk. As for Bobby, I agree he’s interesting. Everyone has a different view of how much personal life of the sleuth is ‘right.’ I think Bobby does provide interesting insight into Steve Solomon’s character.

  3. Kathy D.

    Well, I haven’t read Solomon v. Lord, but I did read a book entitled “Bum Rap” by Paul Levine, which contains Solomon, Lord and Jake Lassiter, sharp-talking, finagling lawyer.
    I laughed constantly, especially with dialogue involving Lassiter. I will read more of these books when I need humor, which is increasingly more often.

  4. I do like the sound of this legal thriller particularly as you mention that it is told with some wit – another one for me to consider, thank you Margot.

  5. Col

    I’ve read earlier books in the series but not got as far as this one yet. I do like his work.

  6. Sounds good, Margot. I do want to read something by this author.

  7. Keishon

    I know I bought this one years ago when I first heard about this series. I’ll need to find my copy. Thanks for the spotlight Margot.

  8. I don’t know this author or series at all, but it sounds most intriguing, I do love a lawyer story – and with Bill backing the author too, I know he must be good!

  9. Kathy D.

    I also learned about Levine’s humorous legal books from Bill Selnes’ blogs. But when I need a good laugh, I’ll read more. Nothing like crackling dialogue from smart-aleck lawyers. In “Bum Rap,” Jake Lassiter defends the First Amendment in a dialogue with law enforcement types.

    • I like well-written wisecracks, too, Kathy. And Levine certainly knows how to write that sort of dialogue, doesn’t he? And, yet, he doesn’t lose sight of the story. That takes skill.

What's your view? I'd love to hear it.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s